In addition to the lack of sticker shock, it does have the advantage of giving the servers more money if they are efficient and busy, and saves the restaurant money on times when the place is dead.
I dunno where you went or what you ate, but self serve in restaurants is certainly NOT the norm in NZ.
And in my experience (yes I’m a Kiwi) I generally get good service where-ever I go - from the “greasy spoon” style restaurant to the very expensive.
Further, I would say that how well a waiter (be it female or male) does their job is more about their attitude and work-ethic than how much tip they are likely to earn.
It was meant tongue-in-cheek. I’m certainly not one of the “White men are now the ones who are discriminated against!” brigade.
Also the article was written by a guy, so I wouldn’t be accusing women of anything here.
Obviously, but I was talking about in terms of the article and what it says about tipping. I was rhetorically asking the author what is the right behaviour here.
I haven’t either, but I’ve lived with those who have. Tips are important to them, and they hussle to get them. They hussle in two ways: one, to serve as efficiently as possibly (cover as many tables/seats), and two: to keep the customer happy. Sure, a good waitperson wants to do these things regardless of tips, but if you add income to the equation, it amplifies the effect.
Ask someone who’s worked in a restaurant or bar. Efficient servers rake in the tips, even though the hot ones might get higher tips per table.
I haven’t read the freakonomics article yet, though. The summary posted here seems to contradict my viewpoint, and I’ll be interested to see what they have to say.
it’s obvious that Jay Porter hates tipping. Other than calling it racism, what better way to show how very evil it is that call is sexism, too?:rolleyes: