I am not sure of the point you are making in describing Obama, but despite his DNA he has always identified as black and has been treated as black his whole life. In an interview with Steve Kroft he said, “I think if you look African-American in this society, you’re treated as an African-American.”
It is a pejorative in the U.S. Nothing bad about the denotation, but then again, that is true of almost every taboo word.
I am not confused at all. When I say “there was a time” I was describing the prevalent view of the average American back in the 50s and 60s. Danny Thomas and Ricardo Montalban were considered white. By today’s definitions they would be “people of color.” I think.
I don’t know much about those people, and that was before my time. What did being “considered white” entail, exactly? The term person of color, like many of these terms, is not referential–it’s ideological.
Danny Thomas was a Lebanese comic actor, born Amos Muzyad Yaqoob Kairouz. Most well-known among his many accomplishments was a very popular sitcom called Make Room for Daddy.
Ricardo Montalban was a Mexican actor who was a star in Mexico then crossed over to American TV, film, and stage. He was probably most well-known for his role as Mr. Roark, the host on the popular TV series Fantasy Island, where he would give people a chance to live out their fantasy which was usually a “be careful what you wish for” scenario (scripted drama; this was not a reality show). He also had the title role in the second Star Trek movie in 1982. He also did TV ads for Chrysler, which were widely lampooned for his reference to “corinthian leather,” because nobody knew what that was. He had a Mexican accent and had this image of kind of a classy guy.
How about anyone who’s heard “We know you’re American, but what are you?” (I was six. So were the people asking.)
How about “Can I touch your hair?” (About four years ago.)
And yet the census forms (at least, as of the previous census) make it utterly clear that Ashkenazi are supposed to identify as white; and I think most people of color and quite a lot of white people in current American society agree with that.
I’m not disagreeing with it, exactly; enough people who look at me appear to think that I’m white that I generally get the benefits of that. (At the time of the incidents above, as well as at most of the others I can think of, I had a pretty good tan on visible areas.) I’m just pointing out that the line is blurry, and moves around depending both on the time and on the people using it.
I believe that “white-passing POC” is certainly a thing. I have white-passing relatives who have been discriminated against once they stopped passing, and they have also dealt with the horrible awkwardness of being privy to “backroom” racial bigotry and being too afraid to say anything.
I don’t think there is a unifying POC experience, however. I think the feeling of “ethnic otherness” comes pretty close, but I imagine anyone can have this experience if they roam around long enough.
My guess is that those 10% are probably predominately Latino, with some Asians represented as well. As far as the Latinos, my guess is that those in the Tea Party probably think of themselves as White. The majority of them are probably people of Spanish and Portuguese descent rather than Mestizos with many Native American ancestors.
As you quoted me when saying that: I don’t think I’m “white-passing”. It’s clear that I’m legally defined as white according to the census, and I’m pretty sure I’m defined by most people who see me as white, including those who know my heritage is Jewish (which I make no effort to conceal, and some effort to indicate, as in the name I choose to use). But there are significant exceptions to that, and I’ve had enough experience with them that there’s a corner of my head that’s very aware of those exceptions.
ETA: on re-reading, I think you may have quoted me just for the blurry-line business, and that I may have been confused about what you were saying, rather than you being confused about what I was saying.
I have a Jewish friend. I see her as “white folk with flava”, but she does not see herself as white at all. I don’t think my label is any less accurate than hers because they are made-up things either way. But I typically defer to self-identity in situations like this. If a person can articulate a semi-coherent argument for why one box works better for them than the box typically assigned to folks like them, then I am down for that.
Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk
I’m half-Jewish (or full Jewish if one ascribes to the “Jewish mother = Jew”) but I have a gentile last name and everyone treats me like I’m white. Generally, only close friends even know that I have Jewish ancestry – not that I hide it, but I generally don’t talk about myself much unless it’s with a close friend.
I am not a POC in any way that matters, IMO. I get all the benefits and privileges of being a white guy in America.
Judaism is a religion, not a race, but most Jews in America are genetically an admixture of European and Levantine ancestry. Europeans are certainly not “people of color”. Levantines - i.e. people from the territories now known as Syria, Lebanon, Israel, Palestine, and parts of Egypt and Iraq - may or may not be “people of color” in the sense that there’s a wide variety of phenotypes there. These territories were at various times part of the Greek empire, the Roman empire, the Byzantine empire, and the Ottoman empire, as well as Norman crusades. Is Bashar Assad a person of color?
Seems to me that “person of color” essentially comes down to what the individual person in question looks like.
