The conclusion is that Germany, the Netherlands, Britain, and America all contain a proportion of “tall, fat white guys”, the casual wear (jeans) or more generally the clothing style marked him as a tourist, and, as fits the topic of this thread, they simply guessed the wrong ethnicity in his, and your, cases. Even if you do look absolutely more German than German.
The problem is that crazies are usually the most vocal and heaven forbid they report you or are HR or upper management.
IMO, PC has gone way to far and because it’s subjective, “Oh…I’m offended!”, the crazies often get their way.
If you can cite an article about this phenomenon, I’m all ears. Because I have never in my life witnessed or heard about someone flying off the handle over a skin tone descriptor.
I hear such these kind of descriptors on the six o’clock news all the time. It seems to me if they were the landmine you and Dinsdale seem to think they are, this wouldn’t be the case.
Unless you have only seen that person on a holy day on their way to pray, or while relaxing in their own home, it’s a safe bet that they wear the headscarf all the time. Veiling isn’t a fashion accessory; it’s a commitment to a religious belief. With the exception of some who do it only to pray, women who wear hijab always wear it when they go out.
(I guess there could be exceptions to that behavior, especially in non-Moslem majority countries, but still, I think it’s a safe bet to assume that if a woman was wearing hijab when you met her, she’ll be wearing it the next time someone sees her out and about.)
Erk, just noticed I wrote a bit illogically above. First sentence should read: *Unless you have only seen that person on a holy day on their way to pray, it’s a safe bet that they wear the headscarf all the time.
*
The part about “relaxing in their own home” didn’t belong. That’s the one place where women who strictly veil while out in the world don’t have to cover. I must be getting too old to write sensibly.
{Bolding mine}
This is 2020 and there are many options available :
- Ask the traveling person for his/her cell phone number. Ask your meeter to coordinate the meetup on phone.
- Ask the traveling person to send her/his photo for better identification
- Ask the traveling person to send a description of themselves for the meeter to identify
- Ask the meeter to hold a board up with the person’s name ( common method for the last 30+ years of my travel).
Also, the use of the word “ethnic” to describe people of color is so 20th century. More here : 4 Reasons Why We’ve Got to Stop Using 'Ethnic' to Describe People of Color - Everyday Feminism White people don’t identify themselves with their ethnicity like German or French or Polish then why use the term for other nationalities ?
When you pass a white young woman, do you wonder about her ethnicity? like if she has German ethnicity or Italian ethnicity. Why do you have to wonder about this young lady’s ethnicity ? Because she is wearing a scarf and not white ?
That person could be a Doctor, a lawyer or a Scientist. Ask them what they like to be described as.
White people belong to the social group with power and privilege. In the past this privilege has been used to develop stereotypes like “Orientals “. US is changing now and many whites have willingly decided to let go of these stereotypes. You can be one of them too - it’s not about it being “problematic” to you, it’s about being insulting to others.
You have the power and the privilege to do as you wish. Many whites guys, I have met, themselves as a mathematical equation such as : I am 1/3 Irish, 1/4 German … and 1/10 Cherokee on my mother’s side. I don’t get that.
I think describing yourself as Human is sufficient just like for all of us.
My step-daughter flew in from the only place in the country with a notable Muslim minority. When I saw several people coming down the concourse wearing hijabs, I told my wife “The flight from Zamboanga has arrived.” She asked how I knew. What am I supposed to say? “Lucky guess”???
I refuse to be ashamed of being observant.
I sincerely ask you to consider the pain and humiliation felt by other human beings.
In circumstances like this, I take comfort in Gandhi :
“ When I despair, I remember that all through history the way of truth and love have always won. There have been tyrants and murderers, and for a time, they can seem invincible, but in the end, they always fall. Think of it–always.”
Who was hurt or humiliated by jtur88’s observation that disembarking passengers wearing hijabs infers a very high likelihood that the flight in question originated from the only place in the country with a notable muslim minority?
The fact is that genetically, race does not exist. Humans are really similar genetically, but there’s more variation within Africa than the rest of the world combined. if you had to divide humans into groups, you’d have three or four groups from different parts of Africa and one group covering part of Africa and the rest of the world. So, in fact, yes, the light-skinned African and the dark-skinned Caucasian (whatever that means) may well be more genetically similar than the light-skinned African and some other medium-skinned African.
Sometimes I wonder if people don’t make this problem out to be harder than it is. For instance, it sounds like this whole thread was prompted by learning that “oriental” is not generally considered a suitable way to refer to, well… anyone. Although one often hears of such things occurring to certain people, I don’t believe I’ve ever found myself in a situation in which I (1) felt it necessary to use a racial or ethnic descriptor and (2) got aggressively called out for not using a person’s (then unknown) preferred descriptor. But then honestly, even working in government, I don’t believe I’ve often found myself in a situation where (1) above is even necessary, so (2) rarely even has a chance to come into play.
Seems like the easiest way, then, is to just not inject race or ethnicity into a description unless necessary to do so, and then to have a general awareness that terms like, say “oriental” are probably not the go-to for anyone with Asian ancestry, whether that ancestry happens to come primarily from China, Japan, Vietnam, etc. As to what’s acceptable… well, here I’d say just about anything from “Asian” to “country of ethnic origin” to “not applicable” would be better. If I ever got called out for using the “wrong” descriptor in someone’s mind, I’d like to think I’d be nimble enough to adapt, and then have the social intelligence to consider whether or not that person might have a point in general and so I should endeavor to shift my vocabulary. Because I guess I can see an older person referring to an Asian-American as “oriental” once, but I guess I’d be scratching my head at just what is driving them if they felt compelled to try and justify using it again, or using racial/ethnic-descriptors flippantly or indifferently, as if it’s either super easy to come up with a one-size-fits all descriptor, or so hard that we might as well just call people whatever we want, irrespective of what they might want.
In other words… no. There is no such list as what the OP is asking for. That doesn’t mean t doesn’t matter, or that all descriptors are equally likely to give offense.
We’re not discussing genetics in this thread, we’re discussing aesthetics. If someone describes a person to me and uses “African” or “African-American” as a descriptor, I’m not going to be looking for someone who looks like Muammar Gaddafi, despite the fact that he was in fact African.
The variation in appearance of people across the continent of Africa means that if I’m scanning a diverse crowd of Africans and looking for a particular person who has been described to me as “African,” I’m going to have a hard time picking him out. But if I’m scanning a crowd of white people or Asian people for the one guy who looks “African,” then that descriptor is going to make my job considerably easier.
Sometimes I do, and sometimes I don’t. And not just w/ women. I do not HAVE to wonder. But I am a member of a species which receives and processes visual information. I tend to observe details about my surroundings - whether about people, animals, plants, landscape… One could obviously choose not to.
And re: headscarf usage, I recently read a lengthy article in the Chicago Trib on the topic, and the conclusion was that one could draw no conclusions either as to the manner or reasons. A significant number of respondents described choosing to wear the scarf or not in any situation depending on any number of factors, including their mood or perceived time constraints. Personally, I tend to consider most cultural/religious clothing choices silly, but I do not draw conclusions as to the manner in which a individual chooses to exercise them.
Okay then.
I met a guy from London who made sure to note he was 100% Irish, and exactly which kind of Irish. So, touchy stuff, that percentage idea may sound like a good theory but in real life not so much. Same for mixing up French and Germans and Poles, or Somalis and Nigerians for that matter.
My mother was from a Catholic family. Women never went into a church without their head covered. They crossed themselves when the car passed a RC church, and they would not eat meat on Friday. They did these things because it eased their conscience to comply. Protestants all knew about these edicts, nobody gave catholics a bad time about it. If you have lunch with a catholic and order a burger, it was not at all offensive, they just laugh and say they have to have fish. To this day, fish-fry is still a popular Friday social option in South Milwaukee.
People used to be cool with customs reflecting ethnic cultures. What the hell is wrong with everybody now?