Considering that it wasn’t even my hypothetical, I didn’t even give a hypothetical, that was another poster, I don’t think you have any clue what you are talking about here.
Any reformulations were to help you with the confusion that you seems to be having with a simple question, to eliminate all the distracint variables that you keep adding in to it.
But, anyway, it doesn’t matter, you refuse to answer a simple question with a yes or no, that’s fine, I can’t make you or anything.
Just be aware that you did not address typoink’s hypothetical in the slightest.
Right, the question that was asked of you is there to be seen, and your dodging of it is also there.
The question you asked about the car crash was answered in full by BeagleJesus, and added to by my opinion on it.
As far as an impartial observer would be considered, if they are still confused as to why blackface is offensive, after not only years and years of history to work with, along with our arguments in this thread, then they will probably lack the comprehension required to divine anything at all.
For your car crash hypothetical. The straight answer is No. It does not matter why you hit me, the damage is the same. My whiplash doesn’t care if you had a stroke or if you were inattentive. My mechanic is not going to charge me differently based on whether you were diligent or negligent when you damaged my car.
Why should I care why you hit me? Either way, I am put out. I’m not going to beat you up or anything because you were texting, so how am I going to treat you any differently if you were having a stroke? (well, I’d be quicker to call 911 for a stroke)
The law may treat you differently, but I am not going to. Why should I? What are you going to do to someone that hit you because they were texting?
That’s not really an answer. I did not misrepresent anything, but you may be confused, as you keep conflating me with another poster, so I don’t know if you are talking to me, or to the other poster that you seem to think is me.
You were the one that seemed to have trouble understanding why blackface was offensive. We did our best to explain.
Now that you have decided to become hostile because we could not explain it to your satisfaction, then no, there is no further progress to be made.
You too bub. Go out wearing blackface all you want. Remember to report back on how it goes.
Well, I disagree that that is a bad decision. And, so, apparently, did the person that you are making fun of right now.
He just wanted to have some fun, harmless, not bothering anybody. You also seem to want to have some fun, but to have your fun, you have to put down other people.
I have much more respect for a person who wears Spidey PJ’s with his gut sticking out than the person who insults them for it.
All words are made up. As well as you fabricating the intent behind it in order to insult and demean.
No one is crying, that is another thing that you have made the decision to make up and throw out there in an effort to prevent productive discourse.
As a long, long time but now ex-smoker, I know what you mean. Sometimes, people would say you should stop smoking, even some would coug as they went by. In theory, they are worried about your health.
What you are doing in telling a person that he is too fat to pretend to be spiderman is different. You are not worried about his health, you are not suggesting he lose weight, you are telling him that he looks stupid because he’s too fat to be spiderman.
I may advise against it if he is going to a job interview, but if he says he wants to go out and play spiderman, I’m all for it. Assholes may laugh, but fuck them, they are pieces of shit who are just jealous that they don’t have the balls to be spiderman.
Yeah, that was pretty stupid on their part. I have no idea what they were thinking.
Not sure what you are referring to.