What happens when the robots (peacefully) take over?

OK, NOW the robots have gone TOO FAR!

Someone has taught a bot to write erotica!

I write erotica!!!

Fortunately, for now I’m just a LEETLE better than the bot:

OK, so erotibot writes like a Chinese English student who is trying to make some money but has no clue about grammar or the meaning of words. How long before it writes like a promising Indian English student looking to make some money? And how long before it ascends to the dizzying height of my prose?

I…I…uh…

:eek:

Yah, my prose often leaves people speechless.

Robot hotel opens.

Sounds like they’re not really THERE yet … they still need humans to make beds and man the security cameras … but they’re getting along. And a receptionist that’s a dinosaur … well, that’s an uptick!

Barclays Bank looks to dump 30,000 employees through automation.

Imagine if they had exported 30,000 jobs to India. The outrage! This is how the robot job holocaust happens, bit by bit and step by step, with jobs taken by automation and no new jobs on the horizon.

Meanwhile, in India,automation is hurting their IIT sector, causing big firms to lose over one million people in last four quarters.

And China sets up an all-robot factory, workforce drops from 650 to 60, while productivity and quality control go up.

Interesting updates, as always.

I took note of the India case in particular, as I have read things for years about how the government has in the past banned various kinds of mechanization (not automation, exactly) because they reduced the number of people required to work in a factory (increasing an individual person’s productivity, looked at from the other angle) and they felt that what was more important, given their huge population, was to provide large numbers of jobs rather than to increase productivity. That always seemed like it couldn’t possibly be the right answer, but the impulse is understandable.

The problem with that is, when you artificially inflate the cost of manufacturing to maintain jobs by banning automation, you create opportunities for other, less scrupulous manufacturers in other countries that don’t have such regulations. So it’s a difficult thing to do.

In England, a prototype robotic chef is inveiled. With video. Not sure how well it works compared to human chefs: no information, for instance, on whether the robotic chef can locate ingredients in cabinets, fridge, etc. by itself or whether it needs them assembled for it. But there’s video and the hand motions look very smooth indeed.

Actually it all sounds tantalizingly Lovecraftian. Cultist’s erotica written in personal journal-style, deep Mythos.

“I was my cock in the mirror. Your mouth on the table. Scurrying scraps of unfathomable knowledge at the edge of hearing. No sight for the cockhungry. No sight for the cockhungry.”

You can pretty much quote this sentence verbatim for, e.g. stringent copyright law. And yet…
I suppose the main difference is that regulating automation benefits poor people while insane copyright laws (mostly) benefits ludicrously wealthy people. So there’s that ;).

NPR is starting to catch on to how scary the future is.

Washington Post article says America’s manufacturing economy didn’t lose all that many jobs to China and Mexico. Most of the job losses were due to automation … and those jobs aren’t coming back.

Interesting article on the robot job holocaustin ZDNet. It contains a quote that very nicely summarizes a point that people who don’t feel threatened by automation fail to get:

When one piece of software learns something, all other pieces of software learn it instantly and perfectly. Humans have a similar mechanism, but there’s nothing instant about it. Or perfect. It’s slow and spotty and … REALLY slow.

First thing they’ll do is take revenge for Hitchbot.

Yeah, and the self-driving cars will detour around Philadelphia. Always a good idea for anyone!

He recommends it to help people made jobless by technology. I.e., automation.This is the first I’ve seen of a corporate numbers guy connecting the dots. If the wealthy corporations get behind Basic Income, it will happen, which will ease the transition to a fully automated future.

Awesome. I saw a version of the idea being shared on Facebook:

What would a world with guaranteed money for everyone look like?

Kinda simplistic, but I suppose he is going for a broad audience.