What If: Meade Attacks Lee At Gettysburg?

This is less a discussion thread (although I’m happy if it turns into one) than a research question:

Inspired by the excellent book One Continuous Fight: The Retreat from Gettysburg, I’m looking for good sources that talk at length (any length, really) about the Battle of Gettysburg after Pickett’s Charge. Namely, about what considerations, if any, were given to continuing the battle on the field after 3 July 1863.

I understand that Lee fairly quickly determined on the night of 3 July to withdraw. Conversely, Meade was content to sit back and watch the withdrawal, insofar as he didn’t want to launch the victorious-yet-grievously wounded Army of the Potomac up against the Confederate position on Seminary Ridge. Also, rain moved in on the 4th, drenching both armies for much of the retreat and pursuit.

So, anyone care to guess what might have happened had they chosen to stay and fight? Confederate supplies and ammo were low, but may have served to last another day or two. The Army of the Potomac was hurt, but IIRC the 6th Corps was largely unscathed in reserve. Did Meade ever have a plan ready to attack if necessary/ordered?

Thanks!

My understanding is that Meade had no plan to attack, and was perfectly content to stand his ground and let Lee withdraw. At the start of the battle on July 1 Meade had been in command for just three days, mind you. He was still figuring out the job. Unlike all of his predecessors (all of whom were fired), he had made no major errors in his first major battle; Lee had made several.

I separately asked both Shelby Foote and James McPherson, when I met them, if they thought that Meade had acted appropriately immediately after July 3. Foote said he hadn’t, and that he could have been much more aggressive, as Grant, Sherman, Sheridan or Hancock would have been. McPherson said, given how briefly he’d been in command, Meade had done all that could reasonably have been expected of him.

I’m with Foote. The Sixth Corps, the biggest corps in the Army of the Potomac, was largely intact, as you say. Meade could have moved it around the Confederate right to flank it, trying to get between it and its line of retreat, and by forcing it to move could then have struck when it was most vulnerable. But he didn’t, and the President had cause to regret it: http://www.brotherswar.com/Gettysburg-3z.htm

See this book for an interesting what-if of a Union counterattack after the failure of Pickett’s Charge: http://www.amazon.com/Gettysburg-Alternate-Greenhill-Military-Paperback/dp/1853674826/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1237400639&sr=1-1

What happens is

Meade is wounded in the artillery barrage that precedes Pickett’s Charge. W.S. Hancock takes command as senior officer on the field. His counterattack rolls up the Confederate line, and the rebs quit the field in disorder. Lee is captured on July 5 or 6 as his shattered army flees southward. The war ends by the fall, and Hancock is elected President in 1868!

I would suggest you read Stephen Sears Gettysburg, for a look at Meade’s thinking on the night of July 3rd. IIRC, Meade held a council of war, and it was nearly unanimous among the Union generals to NOT attack on 4 July. Remember that by the evening of July 3, John Reynolds of I Corps was dead, and Hancock and Sickles of II and III Corps were wounded, and Sykes had commanded V Corps for all of 4 days, after Meade had assumed Army command.

I, II, III, and XI Corps had been seriously chewed up by the fighting, I and XI on July 1, and II and III on July 2, with II Corps taking the brunt of Pickett’s Charge as well. XII was holding the Union right over on Culp’s Hill, and V the left based on the Round Tops. VI Corps was largely intact, but they had spent July 2 making a grueling 30 mile forced march in the July heat, and ‘Uncle John’ Sedgewick was not the Union’s fiercest driver of his men. Perhaps a prompt counter-attack might have carried the CSA lines, but the Union corps had been broken up into individual brigades and divisions on July 1 and 2 to merely hold Cemetary Ridge and the Round Tops, coupled with the difficulty in coordinating army movements in the pre-wireless age would’ve made the decision to counter-attack extremely difficult to implement.

Couple these with the fact that Confederates on Seminary Ridge would’ve had the same advantages the Union had in defending Cemetary Ridge, along with the rainstorm on July 4, and a successful Union attack seems less and less likely. In fact, I’m sure Lee and Co. would not have minded trying to repulse a Union assault against strong defensive sites. Meade did an excellent job in his first battle, clearly out-generalling Lee, stopping the Army of Northern Virginia and forcing it to withdraw, I feel that with the casualties inflicted on the Army of the Potomac, destroying Lee’s army on July 4 was not a credible choice.

Meade’s biggest failure though was his slow pursuit once it was clear Lee had skeedaddled. A more forceful response on July 5th might have pinned Lee up against the flooded Potomac and given Meade a chance to wipe out Lee. But, as the Civil War showed time and again from Fredericksburg through Pickett’s Charge to Cold Harbor to Petersburg, the tactical defense was stronger than the offense.

In fact, Sears related a story about Lincoln, who on hearing of Lee’s escape, wrote a letter to Meade taking him to task for that, and who then put it in his desk drawer, never sending it to Meade. Certainly, Lincoln recognized the missed opportunity, but also realized that Meade had performed quite well, based on the situation he found himself in on June 30 when he received the order to relieve Hooker.

Hey wargamer, long shot question based on your username: do you know of any Civil War scenarios for The Operational Art of War III? I had an old Avalon Hill game for Antietam that I enjoyed but can’t play on my computer.

Sorry, I’m more of a boardgame wargamer. Don’t have OAW III. (I think I had OAW 1 when it first came out, but that’s been a while back…)
Dang, I’m old.

As discussed in the first link I provided.

And as Lincoln is said to have frustratedly remarked, “No council of war ever voted to attack.”