What if William Shakespeare and Leo Tolstoy had been able to use computers and word processors?

These arguments strike me as something grumpy old men always say when they are confronted with a technology that did not exist before they reached puberty.

I find it especially strange how some writers of a certain generation are emotionally attached to their mechanical typewriter and think a computer is the work of the devil. Maybe 15 years ago or so, I talked to a retired judge who wrote articles for law journals. He had learned to touch type when he was a student, had used a typewriter all his life but steadfastly refused to switch to a computer.

I guess when the fountain pen was invented, traditionalists complained what a horrible idea this is: Instead of having to dip the quill into the ink every few seconds and be given the chance to collect your thoughts, you would continue to write uninterruptedly for minutes on end, which can’t possibly be any good.

That’s just the modern way to procrastinate. In the olden days, I would read in my (printed) encyclopedia and learn about things I absolutely did not need to know about instead of doing my homework for the next day.

Time for me to reread JRR Tolkien’s letters again, to get the details right. (Of course, an expert will shortlyl pop by to correct me errors!) I recall that one of the huge problems he faced in writing LOTR was the drudgery of getting each draft typed out. Then he’d make changes & need to have the whole thing done again.

Others did most of the big jobs for him. But he typed some of his own correspondence; once, he apologized for using red letters, as the black half of the ribbon was worn out. At one point, he wanted an electric typewriter…

I doubt he’d have had patience to work with the early, clunky WP systems. But I can see him using some magically supplied, well equipped PC–after some patient training. Hey, he could design fonts!

I took a class while working full time, my wife worked nights, and we had three small kids, including two infants. The lessons were broadcast on a college TV station and the teacher required a one page essay every week. I normally fiddle with my copy so much on a word processor that the only way I could knock the essays out in the little time available was to use a typewriter. It forced me to think before I wrote and stick with what I wrote.

This reminds me of a section from Douglas Adams book:

Of all of The Writers of Who, Adams probably had the best sense of the big ball of wibbly-wobbly, timey-wimey…stuff. [/hijack]

With the advent of copy & paste, Shakespear would have been able to plagiarize (sorry, “borrow from”) a lot more of his contemporaries’ work.

There wouldn’t be a tree left on Earth by now, after all the reprintings for typos and other minor changes.

Well, from what I hear now, since nobody really knows how long digital media will last, it is very likely that we would have no original editions left of either Shakespeare’s or Tolstoy’s work.

Actually, do we have any of Shakespeare’s original stuff - hot off the pen - still extant?

With Shakespeare’s habit for making up words, My guess is that every time he sat down to write, after about 15 minutes of having auto-correct changing things , he would throw the computer out the window and spend much of the rest of his life in anger management classes.

Shakespeare would have used a curse generator:

http://www.pangloss.com/seidel/Shaker

War and Peace
Available for X-Box and Playstation III.

Maybe Shakespeare. Based on the contents of his diary, Tolstoy would be completely sucked into the porno.