For someone who cites second hand internet opinions on a pretty regular basis, you seem to have a very poor opinion of second hand opinions.
Critical race theory is a fairly bankrupt theory these days. It means whatever you want it to mean. It started in law schools as a way of examining how laws could be racist without any racism or intent of racism by anyone. It is a perspective that was meant to contribute the greater discussion, not replace logic and reason. It included the notion that racism could exist without racists. But modern day crt seems to just conclude that everyone is racist.
For example:
There is this concept in law called the reasonableness standard. It is a very important part of the legal line drawing process to say what is reasonable and what is not. What constitutes reasonable depends a lot on who is drawing the line. And when all the lines are being drawn by white men, their subjective experiences informs what they consider reasonable. All of a sudden the things white men do fall on the reasonable side of the line and the stuff that black people do fall on the unreasonable side of the line. There is almost no way to fix this without having black people in the room when the lines are being drawn. Same with asians and hispanics and women and every other minority group.
But these days crt is frequently a form of woke academic masturbation.