Ah, to be a Satchmo sandwich between Madeline and Terri. Not so much now that Madeline has left us, but it’s my fantasy, let me enjoy it. Plus YF has Kenny Mars as Inspector Kemp, Cloris Leachman as Frau Blucher, (whinny), and Gene Hackman as the Blind Hermit. How could this movie have NOT been good? Well, I’m sure there’s any number of ways. But it didn’t. It’s Brooks’ best movie ever.
Young Frankenstein (Fronkensteen!) is simply the perfect movie. Not once did they put a foot wrong (cf: the lousy ending in the otherwise hilarious Saddles).
In addition to being a very funny parody of the '30s Universal monster movies, it is also a very loving homage to that same genre, even to using the actual laboratory (pronounced lab-BOR-a-tory, of course!) equipment from the original films. Magnificent!
Best scene? “Put. Ze candle. Beck!”
(Take a look at Son of Frankenstein sometime, and check out Lionel Atwill’s Prefect of Police. Kenneth Mars’ version was surprisingly close to the original - and here you thought he was going waaaay over the top!)
Young Frankenstein. It’s his most fully realized film – good from start to finish.
The Producers is close, though more with the musical reworking than the actual movie, which doesn’t really work all that well. Brooks was still learning how to direct, and wasn’t strong enough to rein in Zero Mostel.
The ending of Blazing Saddles weakens it. The Twelve Chairs is underrated, but not top notch (though with one of Brooks’s best songs).
These words together, in this order, make no sense. Combining the words in this way actually removes meaning from some of them.
YF was my obvious answer. Marty, Gene, Peter, Madeline, Cloris, Terri, egads what a phenomenal cast. I still murmur “Taffeta sweetheart.” sometimes when giving a hug. Blazing saddles is close second. When Mel stopped working with Gene things fell apart.
Tough choice between Young Fronkensteen and The Producers. Both are superb as comedies, but I’m giving it to the former for being a more artistically done film, as well as for having more quotable lines. Apart from those two masterpieces, I’m actually not a huge Brooks fan, although when I rented Blazing Saddles a couple of years ago, I enjoyed it a lot more than I remember doing when I saw it on the big screen back when it was new.
ETA: Why the Gilligan reference? Shouldn’t the “miscellaneous” option begin “Would you believe…?”
Okay, I checked with Aslan, Noam Chomsky, and the ghost of William Buckley, and they all aglreed that those words, in that order, don’t make goddamn bit of sense.
I was really torn, but this post, and that Waco Kid quote, decided it for me - Blazing Saddles wins. I don’t think you could make that movie today, which is a shame. Young Frankenstein comes in a close second, followed by The Producers.
Tough choice, between Young Frankenstein, Blazing Saddles, and The Producers, but I voted for *Young Frankenstein *because it holds together better–it has a better plot driving the gags along. Not a tough choice to rule out *Dracula, Dead and Loving It *or Robin Hood: Men in Tights, which right now share one vote between the two of them.
I haven’t voted yet, but I’m torn about selecting Blazing Saddles. It’s an excellent film, but having got its ass kicked in the “Best Western of All Time” category by Rustler’s Rhapsody, I’m not sure I could vote for it in good conscience.
Did Young Frankenstein ever get its ass kicked in the “Best Monster Movie of All Time” category?
Yyyyyeah, that’s what did it for me. I was going for The Producers, because it’s brilliant, or Blazing Saddles, because of the theme song and that I recognized the singer as Frankie Laine (“Rawhide”) instantly. (Note to Skald: It’s not “Negro love songs,” it’s “niCLANG! work songs.”) But what knockers…