What is the Mereon Matrix and is it fallacious?

Rather than passing immediate judgement on the school of thought underlying the ‘Mereon Matrix’, I would like to defer to those of you whom have more of a background in science or at least academia and whom might best be able to contextualize what this is all about.

Here is a sample video that makes reference to Mereon: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ffcBj1X-Ro0

Here is the official explanation from Mereon.org: http://www.mereon.org/#!unified-field-theory/c4ld

I’ve read through all the above and still don’t have a clue what this is all about.

So I ask you, dear dopers, what is the Mereon Matrix?

From the Book: http://www.amazon.com/The-Mereon-Matrix-Perspective-Paradox/dp/0124046134/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1360934941&sr=8-1&keywords=The+Mereon+Matrix

Mereon is an approach to the unification of knowledge that relies on whole systems modelling. It is a scientific framework that charts the sequential, emergent growth process of systems. A dynamic structure, Mereon provides insight and a new approach to General Systems Theory and non-linear science. Mereon evolved through a new approach to polyhedral geometry and topology that is related to the dynamics of the polyhedra. It is related to a large number of systems, physical, mathematical, and philosophical. In linking these systems, Mereon provides access to new relationships among them and combines geometric and process thinking. This book provides the fundamentals of such connections for an ongoing search for order, directionality, and diversity that is found in this unity. It is written in clear language that manages to connect diverse disciplines and in doing so, makes a complex system easily accessible and understandable. It will be of interest to mathematicians, geneticists, and all those interested in researching unity in science and astrobiology.

I still can’t make head or tail of it.

I believe it is otherwise know as “Time Cube for Dummies”.

Seriously, it’s nonsense.

It’s based on cymatics, the practice of rendering vibrations visible, originally by coating the vibrating surface with particles, though much complicated technology has gone into refining this practice. While the practice is useful for studying vibrations, those who call it a study in its own right insist that the patterns thus observed are meaningful in and of themselves, and that the resemblance of some patterns to those found in nature, architecture, etc. is highly significant and not mere mathematical coincidence. The Mereon Matrix apparently possesses many coincidences – sorry, I mean it’s particularly significant.

Nametag: That was very objective, concise & helpful, thank you!