Is it the sum of stored information and experiences, or the interpretation of the same, or does the mind exist apart from the physical brain?
There is an incontestable, irrefutable, and absolute answer to this question.
Maybe.
For an extremely interesting approach (and some plausible answers) to this question, please read Julian Jaynes’ book;
“The Origins of Consciousness in the Breakdown of the Bicameral Mind”
I think I will. That sounds interesting.
Also try “How Natives Think” by Lucien Levy-Bruhl. First published in 1926; it’s a fascinating look at the mind in cultures that are relatively untainted by modern thought processes. It’s even still in print once in a while !
Whoa. I’ll take “beyond the scope of General Questions” for $1,000, Alex."
Off to Great Debates.
Although he is less than credible in some circles, I can guarantee that you will never look at the Bible, schizophrenia, hypnotism, religion, UFO’s or the basic operation of your own brain and mind once you have read Jaynes’ book.
A sampling of headers in the first chapter:
Consciousness Not A Copy of Experience
Consciousness Not Necessary for Concepts
Consciousness Not Necessary for Learning
Consciousness Not Necessary for Thinking
Consciousness Not Necessary for Reason
He makes exceptionally well though out cases for each one of these seemingly outlandish claims. And that’s just the first chapter in this incredible tome.
Well, just as an opinion with no links to back it up. I think the consciousness is separate from the brain, much like RAM is separate from the hard drive. They use each other but they exist without each other.