So I’ve got a theory that the UK is actually the oldest country in the world. Now if we’re to debate this we have to set up some rules on how a country qualifies. If the country was conquered, colonized, had their government change by violent or extra-legal means or military coup then the clock on that country starts over.
For example if your country was occupied by Nazis your clock starts up in 1945. we can’t count the UK, or England, back to 1066 but only to the 1707 act of union although you might argue and take it back to when parliament took control after the glorious revolution (I’m not sure).
Then it seems like you have started a clock over when a country has lost part of its territory. Why include Ireland but not the US ceding the Canal Zone to Panama?
Or, what is your criteria, and is it what the OP wants?
I didn’t realize I was supposed to resurrect old threads for discussion. Or are you saying that they had the definitive answer and nothing more can be said on the subject.
We’ve had this discussion before, and problem is that there’s no objective way to define when a country “starts over.” It’s like trying to define what the best country is. Everybody ends up setting the criteria so their favorite country wins, and/or their least favorite country doesn’t.
No, it cant be seen that way. The Emperor did not stay in power. The government was wiped away ana the Americans ran Japan for several years. When Japan regained her independence, it was in no way connected to the old Japan.