Before anyone says it, the metric system created a system of sizes and weights first and then fit water into it. The OP is asking for the reverse, and that’s not possible.
Its not really useful having a system of measures thats more exactly defined then your ability to measure things. I imagine the ancients were pretty limited in their ability or desire to make exacting measurements, so having a standard that was easily accessible, like a body part, was probably more important then having something that didn’t vary by more then one part in a trillion or whatever.
They’re still figuring out agriculture at this time, so I think you’ll have more fundamental problems then building a temple. There aren’t even any cities yet.
Droplets of water vary in size a heck of a lot more than human fingers. Are you seriously suggesting that you’ve never in your life seen a really big or really small water droplet?
i tried that once and every time i placed the drop against something i was measuring the drop disappeared into a wet spot. a measuring stick that destroys itself as you use it.
Yeah, but a free-falling drop of relatively pure water (containing no surfactants or viscosity-enhancing compounds, at least) dripping from a small spout or capillary is consistently about 0.05 mL. At least, that’s what we were taught in basic chemistry lab when we did titration experiments: 20 drops is roughly one milliliter.
So a free-falling drop of pure water is in fact a fairly consistent measure of a tiny mass or volume. Especially if you add up some of them and thus average out individual drop size differences.
A free-falling drop dripping from a titration burette, maybe…but that’s because they are standardized and the source of the drop is of a consistent size across burettes. The size of the nozzle affects the droplet size - the burette isn’t producing any sort of “standard” water droplet that represents other droplets existing in nature.