That’s funny.
I’m just over 25, which is considered “overweight.”
I’m pretty lean (I have abs), so it’s unlikely that anyone would look at me and suggest that I need to go on a diet. In fact, I’d like to add 5-10lbs of muscle.
I also mentioned this in the thread on exercising, but I’m surprised at the distribution shown here; BMI concentrates near the normal range as expected and tails off as you go higher but then there’s that range for over 39 (morbid obesity) sticking out like a sore thumb, much more so than the below 19 option, which includes part of the normal range (it’d be like a below 15 or so option). Although I suppose that suggests those people are morbidly obese for specific reasons not necessarily related to the usual culprits.
I can’t bench press, due to my torn rotator cuffs. All I do for chest is incline pressing/benching (with weighted dips thrown in for completeness) and my chest is one of my better/stronger muscle groups. I haven’t touched a flat bench or flat dumbbell-press in over 7 years.
Mine has been steady at 15-17 for my entire adult life. A couple pounds make a big difference on my small frame; I. look peaked when I drop under 100 lbs, but quite healthy at my current weight of 105. I am very fit and have low body fat/defined musculature, so I rarely even get called ‘skinny’.
24.85. I need to start exercising again; I’m a bit of a couch potato and could use some toning up, and to lose 10ish pounds. But it’s not too bad, I guess, so perhaps I should take solace in that.
Heavier. Not necessarily fatter. Could be, could be not. Remember, BMI does not say how much is fat and how much is muscle, and if the fat is the fat that matters. You could be what one poster here likes to refer to as “skinny fat” and which the medical literature calls metabolically obese normal weight or “MONW.” Your BMI alone is not enough to say. Your lack of regular exercise though, compared to the likes of MLS, does make one suspicious that such might be the case.
Not so sure how unusual that is. 36% of adult Americans have a BMI over 30 and 6.6% over 40. So far the most over represented group are the under 19 BMIs - close enough to official underweight (18.5) to use to compare to those numbers. Right now this crowd is running over 9% in that group; nationally the number is only 1.7%.
Yes, we all know bodybuilders get the shaft with how BMI conveys their weight, but for most of us, BMI is a pretty useful tool in determining how healthy our weight is. I’m another of one of those people who is on the border of healthy and overweight (24.5 BMI or something like that), and I don’t think anyone in their right mind would look at me and go “oink, oink,” but one, I have a lot of muscle tone, plus a few situps wouldn’t kill me, but moreover, being ever so slightly overweight doesn’t make one a fatso. Just as a personal anecdote, I think the image graph DSeid linked more or less nails me. If I had to pick which one of those most closely matches my body type, I’d pick the one on the high side of normal weight. Please note: I am not a bodybuilder.