In practice, yes. But winning competitions affords “objective evidence” to wave around, absent which people might suspect cronyism, e.g. scrawlers preferring scrawlers over better artists.
Yet when a competition outcome is (1) pressured and then (2) cited in giving a Laurel, the “objectivity” of it goes out the window, all that remains is the illusion – for everyone unaware of the scores fiasco.
Which reminds me of the very last time I judged an A&S competition, and why I stopped. The MK MoA, an old associate, had just set up new A&S rules, had invited me (as former Royal Calligrapher) and my fellow-calligrapher wife to judge, and would walk us through the new scoring process.
Two scrolls: (1) an actual court award, the Order of the Rose with illustrations very much in the style of the Book of Kells (as the artist showed by including photocopies of the source), even a depiction of the duchess herself. (2) a collection of exact replicas of Book of Kells illustrations, footnoted by source, with photocopies.
My wife and I both felt the first scroll deserved higher marks, not only for the execution of the detailed linework and coloring, but as a unitary design vs. a clump of pictures, and as creative art within a style vs. what amounted to tracery.
But the MoA showed us, paragraph by paragraph, that all such considerations counted only once, while copying something from a source and footnoting that source counted thrice, i.e. under three separate categories (such as “authenticity” which by definition excludes originality). Thus the copyist outscored the creative artist.
Likewise in other media, for instance a woodburned exact copy of a historical scrimshaw design (submitted with a photostat of the scrimshaw) outscored creative work – as all other properly documented copies did, necessarily.
My comment at the time was that the word “Creative” should be dropped from the SCA’s name, perhaps to be replaced with “Copyist”.
In more recent years since my departure, the MK has changed its A&S rules again… but the MK MoA won a Laurel while those rules lasted.