What is your problem, Chronos?

[Stranger_On_A_Train]

@wolfpup

Water vapor is absolutely not persistent, except for trace amounts in the stratosphere from CH4 oxidation. Otherwise it is never considered a forcing in climate assessments but always treated as a feedback. I was not “intentionally” misquoting, “truncating”, or trying to play some stupid game as you seem to think.

You literally truncated the part of the post where I addressed the issue that you disagreed with, to wit:

@Stranger_On_A_Train

If we were able to utilize hydrogen as a combustion fuel at a scale comparable to current use of petrofuels (especially at high altitude) it would have a substantial continuous impact on global heating because water vapor is a potent if not persistent greenhouse gas.

@wolfpup

I don’t want to derail this thread with this digression, but I just wanted to be clear. The proper response would be to admit you were wrong and move on.

You brought up this digression as a specific example of how I “react[ed] very badly to being corrected”, and then when the example is cited to see exactly what I objected to––specifically, your practice of quoting out of context sentence fragments to try to bolster your argument—you want to avoid discussing it.

Stranger