It looks like he had his big brother’s suit on in that picture.
Well, this one time at band camp . . .
(Warning: sound and video)
He’s fired.
Upon checking, nothing official. Definitely deep kimchee, swirling around the drain…
Al Sharpton’s fault.
HA! That is hilarious!!
Financial Times has it in for him: Wolfowitz laid out terms for partner’s pay package
I agree with this. I’m sure Brad Pitt and Russell Crowe pick their noses from time to time. Wolfowitz doesn’t strike me as a bad looking guy for his age.
I saw Fahrenheit 9-11 and I know for a fact he could lube my tractor with his snot locker. So she doesn’t have to be willing.
I have no idea what you mean. Nor am I suggesting that you explain.
I really hope they use more attractive leads for the TV movie.
Don’t discount the mental element in sex. If Wolfowitz spins erotic fantasies as readily as he spins geopolitical fantasies, he might be very entertaining.
He’s a comb licker. Never could abide them.
Oh, come on. He’s obviously very talented with his tongue. What woman would not want that tongue on her after licking the comb that ran through that gorgeous head of hair?
Geez, just typing that makes me want to hurl.
This is quite possibly the most depressing thing I have read on the Internet EVAR. If having a full head of hair is what defines desirable, then I’m less desirable than Paul Wolfowitz. If that’s not a reason to put a bullet into my brain, I don’t know what is.
At least I don’t lick my comb, have holes in my socks, or fuck the world.
The World Bank’s been working on corruption and governance for a while now. They’ve been trying hard to pull their own reputation out of the toilet too.
Now this. Fuck. I’d be happier if this was actual sabotage.
Is this the weirdo in question? Shaha Riza
Sure Wolfie’s pretty repugnant, but it’s unsurprising that there are women out there that would become involved with him, what with the power/money/fame/connections he has. I have to ask, though: This is what $193,000 dollar pussy looks like? Funny, I had a bit different mental picture of what $193K would get you. She must have some really incriminating pics of him or something… :dubious:
I know that everyone is having fun with the sex angle, (this being the U.S. where it seems to be the only angle that counts), but I was more interested in the ethics angle.
Here are two middle-aged people, neither of whom would be considered eye candy, but neither of whom would make one hurl on the street, who got involved in a romantic (i.e., not exclusively sexual) relationship, but then the guy, who is the head of the major single financial institution in the world goes out, after having to be told that his open relationship with a direct subordinate is inappropriate, instead of suggesting a simple lateral transfer so that she no longer reports to him, interferes with the HR department to insist on a significant promotion and an exorbitant raise. This is a guy who has (effectively) admitted to lying to get us into a war, then scurried into the public sector, based on his political connections, and took his lack of ethics along with him to tarnish that institution.
When he moves to his next high profile job, (as he will), what do you figure the recruiting committee will be thinking that they decide to invite a person wholly lacking in ethics or truth to take their six-figure salary?