I’m watching The Storm of the Century on ABC. Granted the storm was big but it is not the gist of the movie. The main part is the demon or whatever it is. Yet from the title you wouldn’t even know it was a horror flic from Stephen King.
my big fat greek chickflick
how to lose a chickflick in 10 days
maid in chickflick
you’ve got chickflick
sweet chickflick alabama
the chickflick planner
pretty chickflick
wild wild west: should have been “wild wild hunk of crap”
oh, and: The breakfast club - they never seemed to explain why they came up with that name for themselves in the essay.
Everyone always says Neverending Story. And they’re always wrong. If there hadn’t been a sequel, guess what? THE STORY WOULD HAVE ENDED! What they really needed to do was make an infinite number of sequels, so the story never stops. However, considering the second one (and, from what I’ve heard, the even-worse third one), it’s best that they didn’t.
The movie about a cop and a waitress winning the lottery had an excellent title, taken from a real New York Post headline: Cop Gives Waitress $2 Million Tip.
But some pinhead at the studio had to change it to It Could Happen to You.
A sequel isn’t a continuation of the same story, Miller. It’s a new story. The only way “Neverending Story” would have been an accurate tale would be if the movie never ended. “Neverending Story” was a whole new movie, whole new story, whole new characters.
For a recent example, I thought American Wedding was a very poor title for a second sequel to American Pie. It sounds like a generic chick flick. They could have come up with something better.
Also, 28 Days Later sounds like the sequel to 28 days.