To head you all off at the pass, pineapples don’t grow on trees, ponies are not baby horses, the gas tank is on the side with the arrow, those little tabs are there to hold the aluminum foil in the box… did I forget any of the usual suspects?
So other than that what did you just find out that’s really cool? I just found out that wombats poop cubes! They have special poopin’ bones that cubify their poo.
(They also have reinforced booties so when they’re scared they can hop into a tunnel face first and their tail-less cartilage reinforced butt is all a predator can reach. That’s not as cool as the cube poop though.)
That’s something I just learned in the past year or so myself (I’m 62).
Next to the Fuel indicator on the dashboard (at least on all American cars I’ve driven lately) is a triagular arrow pointing to the side of the car the gas tank is on.
Because that is something I (at least) never remember from week to week (hey, I’ve got important stuff I need to have in my brain)!
Can’t speak for Europe or Japan, but it is pretty common here in the States.
Well, that’s what Wired said. Wikipedia charmingly notes that “They are not commonly seen, but leave ample evidence of their passage, treating fences as minor inconveniences to be gone through or under, and leaving distinctive cubic faeces.”
So I saw the title and got all excited and I was going to tell how I was driving along a rural highway today and heard periodical cicadas for the first time this year, and how I learned that these were 13 year cicadas from Brood XXIII, also known as the Lower Mississippi Valley Brood, but then I saw some of the cool stuff other people had learned, so I’m just going to sit here with a forced smile on my face.
I was talking with my students today about how to make tetrahedrons out of paper printed with a “grid” of equilateral triangles, and I saw something interesting.
The smallest number of triangles on each face would be 1, and the total number for a tetrahedron would be 4.
Or you can make a larger triangle per face out of 4 smaller triangles, and the total for the tetrahedron is 16.
The next size up is a face made from 9 triangles, for a total of 36.
Next up: 16 triangles per face, total of 64.
You see where I’m going with this? The number of smaller triangles that make up an equilateral triangle appear always to be a perfect square; the total number of smaller triangles making up a tetrahedron also appears to be a perfect square. I don’t understand why, but I thought it was delightful.
My students were nonplussed at my joy.
Edit: ooh, cool! The square root of the total number of triangles is always twice the square root of the triangles on a single face. I guess that’s because there are four faces, and the root of four is two. Huh, I guess that’s also related to why they’re both perfect squares. Math is cool.
NO! I think that’s super cool! How’d you find out what specific group/brood they are? We get cicadas every year ~August and I always wonder if it’s the same type, or does it vary, or if (and if so, when) we get any periodical cicadas.
That the French equivalent of the Spanish beato is bigot. Both mean “someone who is way too devout”. You know, that lady who doesn’t just go to Mass every day but worry about the state of everybody else’s soul, or the Evangelic whose salute isn’t “hello” but “have you received Jesus as your savior?”
If you have some triangle count for a face with side length N, you can get the next size up by adding a row of 2N+1 triangles. Let’s say you have a size-3 face; that has 9 triangles in it. To get a size-4 face, you would add 7 more triangles: 3 of them attached to the original face, and then 4 more to fill in the gaps.
So we have a function that looks like this:
f(n+1) = f(n) + 2n + 1
By inspection, the base case is:
f(1) = 1
As it turns out, f(n) = n[sup]2[/sup] fits the bill. That’s easily seen if we just substitute:
(n+1)[sup]2[/sup] = n[sup]2[/sup] + 2n + 1
And of course our base case is:
1[sup]2[/sup] = 1
Nonplussed? Or unimpressed? (sorry, just a pet peeve. probably a losing battle at this point)
I’d imagined hitherto, that “bigot” was a straight-up English word – originally meaning, as you say, “way too devout”: someone who is forever exclaiming “by God” – meaning it earnestly, not in a taking-the-Lord’s-name-in-vain way. In the light of the above, however: it would seem that the explanation that I’d heard, is mistaken folk-etymology.