Let’s reverse this thread and talk about series that worked desite a lackluster premise.
One of the most obvious is Big Bang Theory. “Nerd & Geek meet Pretty Girl? Show Biz Cliche” is how the reviewers labelled it. But the true-to-life situations and the acting chops of the characters (particularly Johnny Galecki & Jim Parsons as leads Sheldon & Leonard) turned it into a delight.
Buffy the Vampire Slayer. The title sums up what it’s about on the surface, and I didn’t watch it for years because it sounded incredibly stupid but the subtext is much deeper, with many of the situations and monsters acting as metaphors for growing up.
Plus, I just love Joss’ dialogue and sense of humor.
A few more that were not thought to be promising at the time:
Happy Days–Who knew 1950’s nostalga would make a hit?
Mork & Mindy–Spacemen comes to earth. Been done. And Robin Williams! Who is he?
The winner has to be The Simpsons, both in unpromising idea and amount of success. A prime time cartoon hadn’t succeeded since The Flinstones. It was pitched to all the networks, and only Fox picked it up and only as shorts in the Tracy Ullman show. And the rest is a large piece of TV history.
Arguably, The Prisoner was a subversion of the spy genre that was popular in the 60s. Every week, the smart, brave and tough spy failed to escape from the penal colony he was held in.
All of Whedon’s shows, for that matter. “A cheerleader who fights vampires!” A Detective who is a Vampire!" "Cowboys in Space!"One of the many things I admire about Whedon is his ability to turn an incredibly stupid sounding premise into art.
Twin Peaks - beautiful teenage girl is found on shore, washed up from the river, brutally murdered, wrapped in plastic, in a backwoods town in Washington state.
Saturday Night Live. Variety shows were not were not popular at the time. NBC stuck it in the 11:30 to 1:00 slot, where they had been showing old Carson reruns.
The show had nobody famous in it, yet it has spawned more famous actors than any show ever.
Cheers. I remember seeing the first promos for it and thinking, “A sitcom set in a bar? Yeah, like anyone’s going to want to watch that,” and thus immediately disqualifying myself from ever running a network.
I disagree about this. It’s self-described as ‘a show about nothing’ but it was a show about a standup comedian in New York City. And that comedian was Jerry Seinfeld.
Family Ties certainly seemed to have nothing special when it premiered. Good thing Michael J. Fox was such a good performer and made such a real character out of a caricature.
Jim Henson had to go to England to get the Mupper Show done. And I remember watching Avenue Q in a tiny off-Broadway theatre with about 20 other people, most of whom were the cast and crew’s friends and family.
Absolutely Fabulous - When Jennifer Saunders first pitched this series, she was bluntly told that “Two middle-aged women stumbling around drunk all the time isn’t funny.”
“It’s a show about a really smart scientist who goes back in time, inhabits other peoples bodies, and changes small things to make people better. But not like stopping Hitler or anything, just saving some random dude’s wife from ODing”
“How does he know what to do?”
“He has a friend who is a hologram and who has a portable computer from the future that knows EVERYTHING”
“…Kay”
Let the record show I LOVE QL and I think the shows supurb writing made up for a lot of weakness that the show could have. I just think it sounds too farfetched as a premise.