I’m not talking about being a bad model in this case. Going by the description and words like MATRIX DRAW and VIEWPORT, is he some sort of a graphics designer, or aero-engineer? It says:
But what are these “application problems” that existed back then? (1980s?)
Just about everything in the field of science and engineering, including marketing and business modeling among many other things. The 1980’s wasn’t the dark ages. The dark ages were the 1950s.
Back then, it might have been something as basic as charting some sales data, but with the novelty of doing it electronically for the low (!?) price of $7,000.
My suspicion is that the depiction is of plain old “business” rather than engineering, although this would certainly be capable of some engineering work.
Just a dedicated graphics platform, someone who assembles reports for printing. The software way back when was often so cumbersome you had dedicated operators just to know how to draw a graph or chart in such a program.
Sure, $7000 sounds like a lot, but remember it had a full 8K of memory and both upper and lower case! Those sort of bells and whistles don’t come cheap.
[Edited to add: I don’t really need a smiley there do I? Just in case, I suppose I’d better add: :D]
He is analyzing the analytics and his market approach vis a vis downsizing the economics in a growth culture formed by business structures coherent in today’s volatile and rapidliy expanding worldwide market place, and he is basing his strategic growth concerns in today’s modern corporate vision of redundancy over a scalable foundation. duh.
I used that terminal.
It was cool, in a ‘70s sort of way. It could only be written to - to erase a line, the entire screen had to be erased, with an impressive flash. Here’s the technology.
I’m sipping coffee out of a Tektronix mug right now.
One of the selling points of Tektronix was their graphics. Laugh if you want but that little graph he has there was hot stuff at the time. Other, lesser computers could only show text or had to use text symbols to draw crude graphs.
So he is probably doing financial work but has the power of simple graphs to give him the edge over his competitors.
Lord Mondegreen makes jokes about the price then conveniently forgets to mention the 300K byte cartridge tape drive. That’s 300K! On one cartridge!
I wouldn’t call it that expensive. Back in 96 or so, I bought (for myself, with my own money, while in high school) an IBM ThinkPad with a 486DX2 processor and (IIRC) a 280 meg of hard drive. It was $3000.
It wasn’t really expensive for the technology at that time, but it was expensive for the application. Very few personal computers were used in business then. Most efforts for a single workstation in that price range failed. High end word processing machines cost in that range, and weren’t moving, along with small mini-computers being packaged as individual workstations. All of those technologies could be seen as soon to be obsolete because of the emergence of more and more powerful low cost personal computers. The business model of developing devices like that which would only sell a few hundred units a year was rapidly coming apart under the realization that you could sell a million units of something a year if the price was low enough.