Answering you equally serious, you’re assuming this is a failure. You’re rejecting a lot of facts that have been presented to you:
-
Canada simply does not do poorly at the Olympics, it does well. It’s just a fact; when you take the Winter Games into account Canada’s performance is actually very good. If you don’t believe me, look it up. Canada won more than twice as many medals as China in Torino in 2006, and will win more in 2010, and will likely win more in 2014 in Sochi. As a matter of fact we won more than any other country save Germany or the USA and if the advance reports are to be believed it’ll be more of the same if not better come Vancouver. It’s silly to complain that we suck in 2008 when we were cleaning up in 2006; if you balance it out, Canada’s overall performance is pretty impressive for a country this size.
-
Even if we were to discount the Winter Games, you’re assuming that the failure of Canada to win more medals in the Summer Games constitutes a “Failure.” It’s nothing of the sort; it’s a choice that the Canadian government, and pseudogovernmental organizations like schools, have made. Not winning medals in sports you choose not to spend a lot of money on is no more a “failure” than your garage is a “failure” because you bought an SUV instead of the motorcycle I chose to buy. There are only so many resources available at any one time, and Canada as a whole chooses to devote less of them to pursuing medals in the Summer Olympics. So what?
If high schools and universities doesn’t give a flying fuck about competitive sports, you can’t say it’s a FAILURE for them to turn out fewer athletes. It would be a failure if they didn’t produce more athletes if they DID care about those sports. We all suck at things we don’t feel are important enough to bother with. I’m a much better baseball player than I am a basketball player, so am I a failure, or a success?