Don’t be too discourage, jellyblue. We aren’t all Jerry Falwell-hugging homophobes. Northern VA (which has crept down as far as the Fredericksburg area now - about 40 miles from DC) is a liberal, cosmopolitan place with a large, diverse community (and the prices and traffic to go with it). The governor (who is a Democrat) is from NOVA, and a openly gay man represents one of the districts in NOVA in the House of Delegates.
Because it’s not necessary. Sign a power of attorney that enables your partner to make medical decisions for you if you are incapacitated and vice versa. Also the two of you should sign a directive to physicians (living will) about whether and when to pull the plug, and include a statement in it that specifically names your partner and grants access to you at any time. I’d get them notarized as well, and make sure your will is up to date.
Disclaimer - I am not an attorney. However, I’ve known people in the past who have done that very thing and when the inevitable conflict with the family happened, the hospital backed them and not the family because of those documents.
And FWIW, I am not homosexual. I live in a committed partnership with a woman; we are not married. But we have these forms executed and in place in case the worst happens. They work for everybody, married or not, straight or not.
The law does not prohibit durable powers of attorney, health care directives, wills, or property contracts.
The law simply prohibits any “…civil union, partnership contract or other arrangement entered into by persons of the same sex in another state or jurisdiction…” from being enforced in Virginia. It does not prohibit any contract whatsoever between two persons of the same sex. That is a result absurd on its face. The law prohibits Vermont-style civil unions, under any name. It does not prohibit durable powers of attorney, health care directives, wills, property contracts, or anything else.
As I said on page one of this thread, I do not support this law. But I also do not support misstatements of fact when attacking this law, especially since it is so vulnerable to attack on its actual merits (or lack thereof). Hysterical hand-wringing about the effects of the law add nothing to reasoned debate.