One thing that’s different about CA quakes is that they don’t propagate very far. All the mess of faults and all keeps things local. Elsewhere, modest quakes like this one can be felt over a far larger area.
This is one reason another big Madrid quake is such a scary thought. A lot of cities will be affected.
FWIW when I wrote “Fracking” I was talking about the process of pumping fluid into the ground in order to forcibly extract Natural Gas, not oil, which I have understood is called "fracking"and is also the most likely cause for these new earthquakes in the OK area.
It amazes me that people automatically assume that a large-scale earthquake felt over many states is the result of fracking. Do you honestly think that humans could trigger such an event even if it was intentional? Such events have always occurred because of plate tectonics and people have nothing to do with it.
Let me put it this way. If you told the best engineers in the world that you wanted to shake millions of square miles across many states at the same time, do you think they could do it without resorting to nuclear annihilation? If you still think they could, do you think the best strategy is to drill some rather shallow holes in the ground?
The Earth moves whole continents all the time and sometimes the pieces rub against one another (see the Appalachian mountains or Mount Everest). It has nothing to do with people except for the misconception that the ground beneath you has always been where it is now and will stay that way. It won’t. It is arrogant to think that people have the capability to cause earthquakes on a scale that large anymore than ants can bring down a skyscraper.
OK, but that doesn’t explain why the immediate response was to shut down the wells used to dispose of salt water produced from oil wells (mentioned in a previous post), not to mention that waterflood (the process you describe) isn’t used on gas wells, and fracking is the process of fracturing the formation at the completion of the well to facilitate the flow of gas or oil from the rock formation - not injecting water back down wells to forcibly extract hydrocarbons - that is waterflood (also mentioned in a previous post).
I feel I fight a losing battle, and it’s a complicated subject (I don’t know if the salt water being disposed of is being used for waterflood, for example, or if it’s being disposed of in a separate formation), but what is being called “fracking” by you and the media isn’t actually fracking.
Those figures work out pretty close. I’m about 250 miles away, so at a little over 3m/s, that’d put it here at right at 2 minutes later (if I did the math right).
Well i did say fluid and not water specifically because I know it isn’t water (in fact thanks to the Bush administration they didn’t have to ever reveal what exactly was in the fluid, although I am not 100% sure if that is still true).
But anyway, let’s forget I mentioned the fracking The important point is it’s worrisome we are getting earthquakes in that area because the cities there can’t handle it the way the west coast and Japan can.