*Playing chess .
*Liking classical music, opera, and ballet.
*Being big on NPR and PBS.
*Reading the NYT and The New Yorker .
*Soi-disant “serious fiction”.
People seem to think medical practitioners are way, way more intelligent and/or scientifically knowledgeable than they usually are.
That may have been the case in the past. But with the rise of microbreweries and IPA-sobs and the like, the world of beer is now just as riven with pretension as wine.
Back when John T. Molloy wrote Dress for Success, a poll he did said a British accent was positively associated (by Americans) to intelligence and class.
When I was in grad school for mechanical engineering, I roomed with some medical students. They studied an awful lot, but mostly it seemed like just a shitload of memorization.
Doctorin’ is a whole lot more than memorization. But I have a theory, of course:
Their brains are so saturated with their medical knowledge - often a very specialized sliver of medicine - that they may not have the capacity to, say, know how to sort a Word document.
This thread is about things that are wrongly associated with intelligence. I am beyond certain that being a medical practitioner is correlated with higher intelligence.
Over-correlated, in popular perception, maybe. But there is no way on earth it is not correlated.
For whatever its worth, I trach English, Government, and Economics. People are orders of magnitude more impressed by Economics than the other two. In reality, it’s the easiest and more straightforward subject of the three.
Assuming that intelligence shows a normal distribution in Canada I’d say that at least 1/3rd of Canadians requiring corrective vision (that is 24% of the total amount of Canadians) have an intelligence below the Canadian average. Probably more.