What was Dracula's end game in moving to London?

The children of the night. What music they make!
I suggest that you all watch Love At First Bite.

I do not drink…wine, and I do not smoke…shit.

Seems like if everyone wore a choker covered with crosses, they’d have nothing to worry about. That, or a suit like Matthew Lesko’s, covered in crosses in lieu of question marks.

George Hamilton, right? How the hell can you have a tan Dracula? :slight_smile:

Don’t think. Just…accept. :wink:

From the point of view of the author, it seems obvious that a conceit had to be found, in order that conversation could continue in English rather than Transylvanian.

From the point of view of a predator, (as is hinted above) a city full of well-fed, wimpy, unaware prey must be infinitely more tempting than a rural landscape sparsely populated with strong wily peasants weaned on stories of your horrors and how to fight/avoid them. And as has also been said, London had shipping, which meant a larger population of transients, who would not be easily missed or tracked down. He could feed for years without anyone suspecting, if he was smart about it.

But the OP is correct that the book doesn’t go much into his logistical problems.

In the Dracula melieu, sunlight only removes powers, it doesn’t otherwise harm the vamp. If he wants to sunbathe, he can…he just can’t mind-whammy potential victims, or change into a bat.

William Marshall managed. :slight_smile:

The King of Cartoons is a vampire? AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH!!

(“Vampire” is today’s secret word!)

:smiley:

There’s also plenty of brown vampires in From Dusk Til Dawn.

Tanning beds. That wasn’t a period piece, it was contemporary to when it was released, right?

Victorians wrote really wordy, period.

Did Dracula share in the life energy his brides obtained from drinking blood? If so, this would make Dracula essentially a “blood pimp”.

Chicken Paprikash. But he didn’t actually give the recipe, a la Diana Mott Davidson – he was giving local color.

[Archer]Are we doing phrasing? Because I think we should bring back phrasing.[/Archer]

If it was a priest you could call him The Diddler.

Van Helsing does state that in the book, though, when he’s trying to get Arthur on board to kill Lucy.

So Van Helsing is wrong, and there’s a manner to making more vampires than just being killed by one, or Dracula is destroying his prey after death, lest they become too numerous and attract attention of forces powerful enough to destroy him. Lucy may be a risk as she’s new and is too feral, perhaps, and so can create vampire after vampire.

They just killed Lucy. I’m a little more than halfway through, and the story is at least picking up a bit.

The Transylvanian locals probably helped with this. They’d know enough about vampires to know what to do if a body showed up with little holes in its neck.

I’ve read one vampire novel (I believe it was Citizen Vampire by Les Daniels–vampirism during the French Revolution) in which the vampire would steal his victim’s hearts after killing them, to prevent them from rising as vampires themselves. A string of bodies with their hearts torn out says “homicidal maniac,” whereas a string of newly made undead says “Vampire on the loose, grab the stakes and crucifixes!” Which is the last thing he wanted people thinking.

Not necessarily.

"Oy, yenta, you've got the wrong vampire!"

Yes, the geometric progression involved in “everyone who is bitten by a vampire becomes a vampire” means that the notion is a mathematically impossible pyramid scheme. Sort of Amway, but with fangs.

I wonder if anyone has written fiction that takes it seriously, where eventually everyone is a vampire and there is nobody left to feed on. Van Helsing says they can’t eat anything but blood - I guess that would be vampire apocalypse, unless they can feed on each other, and that violates the law of entropy.

Lucy is only a vampire for a few weeks, but she is biting children like crazy, enough to make the papers. Which again highlights the preposterousness of the whole thing. There are, what, half a dozen children bitten by the “bloofer lady”? Dracula is in England for a few weeks, and already he has a dozen competitors attracting attention to his scheme.

Yes, IMO it gets going better. Until the final pursuit, which could be cut by half with no loss. I love the novel, and I have read it several times, but it’s not exactly paced like Indiana Jones.

Regards,
Shodan