What was samarian culture like

I remember about 10 years ago reading the booklet that the PC game “age of empires” came with. it described all the different cultures in the game (assyrian, greek, sumerian, etc).

The sumerian culture seemed respectable. they would let slaves earn their freedom, and i think they gave more rights to others.

Also im all but certain the phrase ‘good samaritan’ comes from the sumarian culture.

So was sumerian culture humane in an inhumane world or is this an exaggeration?

This is Samaria whence came the Good Samaritan.

And this is Sumeria .

And is very different from “Cimmerian”.

http://www.dodgenet.com/~moonblossom/hyborian.htm

GO CONAN!! :smiley: :cool:

Ignoring the Samaritan/Sumerian mixup that aldi corrected, you’re misinterpretting the point of the parable of the Good Samaritan.

The Good person in the story wasn’t a Samaritan because the Samaritans were (or were believed to be) a particularly good people. Quite the opposite - he was a Samaritan, because the people being told the story would assume the worst of the Samaritans. But the Samaritan, unlike the priest and Levite who passed the injured man earlier, went out of his way to help an unidentified man (who would be assumed to be a Jew, and thus the Samaritan assumed to be hostile to him, whereas he was of the same people as the priest and Levite.) - illustrating the point of the parable: ‘Love Thy Neighbour’ applies not just to your own tribesmen, but to everyone - even those your people are usually hostile towards.

And don’t confuse the Samaritans with the Sarmatians either.

Samaritan is a citizen of the ancient nation of Samaria.

According to Tanach, fighting that started with Shlomo (Solomon)'s sons led to a split of Israel into two kingdoms: Israel and Judah. Israel was also called Samaria. The Judeans kept to a more traditional observance of Judaism, and since they had the Temple in Jerusalem they were considered “good.” According to Tanach, the Samarians wandered off into various unapproved religious practices. The Assyrians attacked the Samarians, defeated them, and carried off most of who remained as slaves.

Samaria had taken territories traditionally associated with 10 of the “tribes of Israel”, while Judah took the other two (Judah and Benjamin). When the Assyrians carried off the Samarians, the legend of the “10 Lost Tribes” grew up. Actually they were never “lost”, they just disappeared into Assyrian culture.

By the time of Jesus, what the Romans called Palestine was mostly in southern Israel, while the Syrians had migrated into Northern and coastal Israel. Judaism was still predominant.

Perhaps the parable should be renamed “The Good Unbeliever”. Tanach (especially the two Books of Kings) tears apart the Samarians, depicting them as base, evil, unbelieving, etc.

More to the point than the stories of the Prophetic books of the Old Testament, which, while they do condemn the sins of the Kings and Kingdom of Israel that had its power base in Samaria, the “Samaritan” referred to in the “Good Samaritan” story refers to non-Jews who were forcibly relocated to Samaria by the Babylonians. I believe they are referred to in the book of Nehemia (chapter 4) as enemies of the Jews, and it is in this context that the goodness of the Samaritan is considered surprising.

I willingly admit that I don’t know anything about the New Testament, so this meaning of Samaritan escapes me. As for Nehemia, that I’ve read, but it refers to Samaria only once. Good catch!