I wonder, though, what was the typical size of a family? I can’t imagine that owning slaves was like owning cars, where the Volvo is the wife’s, the Lincoln is mine, son Bobby has his Mustang, and daughter Jenny her hybrid Escape. Maybe the better statistic, is what percentage of households had slaves?
Sorry for the confusion. The paperwork was filed with the paperwork they kept on the buying and selling of horses, since slaves were considered property like horses and livestock…not that they found a filebox in the stables.
Even so, is that because slaves are equated with horses, or just because they were labor expenses associated with agricultural/stable operations? You would expect that the records of paid hired hands would be stored in the exact same file, and what would be the shame in that? Certainly slaves were treated horribly and considered as property, but in this anecdote I just don’t see the slaves = horses mentality that is implied.