If we are all immigrants from Africa (a vast oversimplification of the details I know), surely all the languages from the human family tree are related (even if distantly).
We have types like Semetic and Indo-European with no obvious relationship to each other at all… yet they must have some common ground - considering both have common elements (such as alphabets & writing/distinctive sounds etc.)
So if we consider the first groups of humans - running around in East Africa eons ago - is it possible to determine (ever) what thier original language must have sounded like?
It’s hard to say if anybody will ever know for sure, but there are researchers trying to figure it out:
www.santafe.edu/sfi/publications/Bulletins/bulletinSummer01/features/language.html
Hmmph! You animalcentric armchair linguists make me sick. There were civilizations of intelligent plants long before the mobile oppressors crawled from the sea.
Not really. If a group emmigrated from Africa before the development of language was complete, they could have developed their own language independently of the groups that remained in Africa.
[slight hijack]
Which is the oldest language that is currently still in use? There are so many that come to my mind (Chinese, Hebrew, Sanskrit and Urdu), but I can’t think of the oldest… [/slight hijack]
> Which is the oldest language that is currently still in use?
There’s no real answer to this question. The Chinese spoken today is not a single language but a set of about nine related but distinct languages. No speaker of any of these languages could understand the Chinese of 2000 years ago any more than a speaker of Italian could understand the Latin of 2000 years ago. Indeed, no language stays the same enough for even 1000 years. There are cases where what we call a language now is the same as what we call the ancestor of that language 1000 or 2000 years ago, but the two stages of the language are not mutually comprehensible.