There absolutely, without a doubt, would be societal collapse. Global trade is simply too tightknit in a way that’s impossible to unravel. It’s not about the finished goods that people see on store shelves. It’s about the machines that make the machines and the machines that make the machines that make the machines and so on.
For example, CPUs are still being made in the US and Micron has a single DRAM factory in the US but, AFAICT, all cellphone basebands are made in Asia. Most of the world’s cotton mills are in Asia and so are most of the world’s steel mills. China has some 75% of the world’s rare earth output and also the majority of the world’s solar panels.
This is just a minute fraction of the supply chain that would be disrupted. A million things people never even think about in their day to day life would become unavailable. Oxygen sensors, hypodermic needles, solenoids, nozzles, food dyes, screws, there’s a million things in our everyday environment that we would need to figure out if we could source in adequate amounts if Asia dropped off the map.
Not to mention, if we can’t trade with Asia, we probably can’t trade through Asia either and the Malacca Strait is the heaviest trafficked shipping lane in the world.
The problem is our economy is so interdependent it’s impossible to fall back gracefully. We couldn’t even elegantly downgrade to 1970s technology because so much of our current infrastructure is reliant on other parts of our infrastructure to work. For example, if we could no longer process credit card transactions on the network because some key component is coming from Asia, we could still theoretically use those old ca-chunk style machines. But there’s not enough ca-chunk style machines in existence nowadays to handle the load, nor could there ever be because we’re processing thousands of times more transactions than we were back then. If the credit card network starts breaking down, then the banks start collapsing. If the banks start collapsing, then companies can no longer get the financing needed to rebuild all the infrastructure. As the companies start collapsing, people start rioting and destroying even more stuff. It all descends into chaos and a reversion to the dark ages. There’s not elegant middle ground, it’s a binary state of affairs.
I’d say if we had, say, 10 years advanced warning that trade with Asia would cease abruptly and we devoted those intervening 10 years solely to this problem, we could maybe, maybe devolve down to a 1970s or 80s style technology without mass societal collapse. Anything more drastic than that means the end of civilisation.