Much talk lately about governments, fed and state, getting into the cannabis business for the taxes. Now a new article about unions planning to be heavily involved. Everybody is lining up for their piece of the pie. How will this all shake out?
There is already serious discussion at the federal level about a Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Marijuana and Firearms.
I haven’t seen the unions connection. Help a feller out?
Nobody knows how it will all shake out. Except the shake will definitely be worth less than the bud.
I find it interesting that a lot of anti-tax nuts suddenly like the idea of taxing marijuana.
Where is the tobacco industry in this? ISTM they would want to be a player, in that they already have the infrastructure to grow, process, and package the stuff, and they already exist as tax-paying entities. Perhaps only license them to grow it and sell it commercially. Maybe time to throw them a bone?
FTR I do not smoke.
This is probably a IMHO question.
But, in order to eliminate the illegal underground economy of pot the legal stuff will need to be affordable and accessible. Or society will not cash in tax wise and the illegal economy will remain.
If the legal outlets provide a cheap price, good quality pot and few roadblocks, the legal pot will eliminate the underground market and you can tax away at it. But you do that later, after the legal economy has displaced the illegal market.
If governments get too greedy with expected tax income right out of the gate then these initiatives will fail to provide the expected tax revenue and the underground economy will continue to thrive.
I agree with this. How many people grow their own tobacco for cigarettes?
Reported for forum change.
I think the expectation is that the price will remain about what it is today, but the various levels of government will be taking the profit.
Also, I assume it would have to be legal to grow for personal use, as it is with making wine and beer.
The tobacco industry don’t actually grow the tobacco, they make and sell tobacco products. Farmers grow the basic product. I don’t doubt for a second that big tobacco will step up to process legal pot into whatever forms we want, and they’ll tell us it makes us cooler, thinner and more sophisticated too. I don’t see any reason the government should throw any bones to big industries. If they want to license certain farmers to grow it, in a quota system for example, it wouldn’t be much different from other crops and I’de be cool with that if they also allow small, home growers, kind of like they did with homebrewing.
Since this requires speculation, let’s move it over to IMHO.
Colibri
General Questions Moderator
I noticed this too. According to one of the recent (yesterday) news articles I read, one of the new bills in Congress specifies a federal tax of 50% on the (retail?) purchase price. I don’t see where that’s going to put the marijuana black market out of business.
Another illustration of the Laugher Curve.
OK, but if you were stoned you’d think that was funny.
There was a common notion (at the urban legend level, at least) back in the 1980’s or 1990’s that all the Big Tobacco companies, drooling in anticipation that pot would be legalized Real Soon Now, were staking out their territory by registering brand name trademarks, just so they would have them in place when the time comes. Of course, there was also a competing common notion that this was all just baloney.
Maybe now they’ll really start doing this. (If they haven’t already :rolleyes: )
Here is a conundrum. Fighting the Evil Tobacco Companies has been (I think) a largely progressive liberal hobby for a good many years, as opposed to the Evil Conservative Republican Corporate Lapdogs who staunchly defended the tobacco industry’s Freedom to Pollute Everyone Else’s Atmosphere for Profit. But legalization of pot has also been an entertaining progressive liberal hobby for a long time too.
I see a contradiction there. Do progressive liberals (yes, that includes me) want to see the Big Evil Tobacco Industry grow to become the Big Evil Marijuana Industry as well, in all the ways that we’ve always seen Big Tobacco as evil?
Myself, I’m all for decriminalizing pot, but I don’t want to see it super-commercialized like tobacco has been.
(Missed edit window just above.)
I meant to add some examples of ways we’ve seen Big Tobacco as being evil:
e.g., heavily marketing to kids; marketing on macho/cool/sexappeal; manipulating ingredients for maximal (habit-forming?) potency; lobbying ad infinitum for every kind of legalized perk/taxbreak/etc.; funding allegedly “independent” medical studies; etc.
Linky no worky.
And I don’t want to see it marketed with addictive additives like they put in cigarettes.
Not necessarily, assuming that marijuana achieves the same level of legality as tobacco.
Tobacco remains a profitable industry, and unlike tobacco, marijuana does not require any processing beyond weighing and packaging.
It’s completely legal for you or me to grow our own tobacco, but tobacco requires curing, drying, and maybe some additional processing before it can be rendered into its final product and it’s not worth your everyday tobacco user to go to all that trouble.
Marijuana OTOH can be used directly off the plant, and, if memory serves, many consumers prefer to prepare their own final product.
This is incorrect. Marijuana has to be dried and cured to make what the public used to. Straight off the plant it won’t burn, and tastes a lot like smoking Tums. The process is far less intensive than the processing required for tobacco, though.
ETA: The process for marijuana is not without it’s pitfalls, either. Cure it poorly, and you can get all kinds of awful tasting mold, or end up with it permanently having that “Tums” taste.