There has been an ongoing problem with inter-tribal and religious wars in Africa for decades. This has led to mass starvation in the sub-Saharan region and atrocities in central Africa.
At a regional conference on the problem, an attempt was made to restrict small arms, for small arms are the primary weapon used in the violence.
In stepped the USA, which without recognizing the difference between its own anti-colonial revolution and Africa’s problem with tribal and religious sectarianism, decided that the guns must not be restricted in Africa.
Hmmm…, this makes me wonder: who has the most guns right now, the good guys or the bad guys?
On to other thoughts. Is the U.S. Constitution one we should try to promote as a model for those African countries struggling to get a grip on life in the world of representative democracy?
And, if we can cutoff arms supplies (which is not accomplished by mere fiat), how do we go about picking the winner in the various regional conflicts (probably has something to do with my first question)?
I doubt seriously banning weapons will accomplish anything. They’ve been fighting without our help, interference, or cooperation for centuries.
Also, I’m sure there’s someone somewhere who will sell them guns. So, while I’m sorry the USA has to stick up for this “right” and all that, in the long run this sadness will keep going on.