What's inside of Jupiter?

That’s Mars

Jimmy Hoffa…

From the wiki article article on Jupiter;

you’d be dealing with sufficient pressure at that point to probably destroy any flagpole we could make.

Also, there might not be a very clear dividing line between the rock core and the soup just above it… (chunks of fairly large rock floating in a hydrogen-methane liquid mixture, all at high pressure??)

Drops.

And if you get them in your hair…

…they’re just murder to shampoo out.
:stuck_out_tongue: :wink: :smiley:

Only if someone figures out a way to conduct mining operations there, which, given the pressures . . .

A large supply of comets, carbohydrates that will condense into a suger-like coating on plants in the Middle East, and assorted vermin capable of surviving an interplanetary flight, and then be viable on Earth. Velikovsky told me, and he was right about the temperature of Venus, right?

[Homer]Mmmm… De Beers…[/Homer]

I would really like to have a jar of liquid hydrogen.

And threaten people with it. Because I could.

No, no, no. That’s the composition of the 70% of the brain that we don’t use. Juputer is a vast sphere of gas and debris orbiting Bill O’reilly.

Yes to both. We’ve probed the outer layers, but no probe can survive down to the really interesting parts, and we can only just barely approximate the kind of pressures found in the core in laboratory experiments, and even then only for a very small fraction of a second. So there’s still plenty of room for speculation on the details of Jupiter’s core. Also note that under extreme conditions, the lines between “solid”, “liquid”, and “gas” can be rather blurry, meaning that even if the very center is definitely solid (and as I said before, it really isn’t definite), that still wouldn’t necessarily mean that there’s a well-defined surface.

I don’t think I’ve seen a post with so many useles “jokes” in it as this one. Do those of you making “jokes” here have anything to contribute? Because I see some good, helpful answers, and a bunch of useless, unhelpful posts which are wasting space. Are you here just to see your names in print? There’s a forum for that, MPSIMS. I thought I was here to learn about what’s inside Jupiter, rather than what you think is funny.

Not to be picky, but the diamond inside Jupiter first appears in Clarke’s 2010. Dave Bowman as The Starchild descends through Jupiter, finding primitive lifeforms living in the atmosphere, then passing through the funky hydrogen layers and eventually finding at the core, if I remember the passage correctly…

After Jupiter gets monolithed at the end of 2010, chunks of the diamond are blown out into orbit, and one particular chunk that landed on Europa plays a major role in 2061.

In epilogue of 2061 the diamonds in orbit around Jupiter are eventually harvested and used to create space elevators, among other useful things.

Hmmm, isn´t metallic hydrogen just a theory?, I mean, it hasn´t been ever observed, and it´s just an hypothesis of the behaviour of hydrogen at extremely high pressures. Am I right?

I just figured out what’s really inside Jupiter! Upite.

Print?!

Names?!

Oh, yes, names.

An interesting subject. Not all the votes are in yet: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metallic_hydrogen

I had to fight the temptation to change “The researchers used a 1960s-era light gas gun…” to “The researchers used a 1960s-style light gas gun, for 20 minutes…”

Blinky the Clown

AFAIAC, the jokes are no less helpful than the incredibly poorly referenced (though not by its own shoddy standards) Wikipedia article that seems to be so popular in this same thread.

A better general purpose page would be the Jupiter page at NinePlanets, one of the most respected astronomy references on the web:

Or, since they are the folks that found out about most of this stuff, NASA/JPL’s Jupiter page, as well as Bytegeist’s academic sources in post #8.

Strawberry jam.li That explains the Great Red Spot.[/li]
Cecil started the tradition of inserting jokes amidst the science, shall not his acolytes pay homage?