Circling back, because this is actually important in this discussion.
Not exactly. What policy has prioritized, via mandates in PPACA, is ready access to preventative medicine, which is how contraceptives – and annual gynecological visits – are classed. (Along with annual checkups, vaccinations and a few other things.) That’s why every insurance plan must provide these things with no copay now, because the prevention of illness and disease is an obvious priority, and should be. And we’ve covered how contraceptives are used not merely to prevent unwanted pregnancy, but to treat a host of gynecological disorders, but we haven’t really touched on their importance in actually planning pregnancy. Preparing for pregnancy and having adequate spacing between pregnancies (at least a year, 18 months minimum is better) are very underplayed aspects of maternal and fetal health. A public policy that didn’t address this most basic aspect of giving every child the healthiest start in life possible, it would be a failed public policy.
In a given calendar year, a Planned Parenthood clinic will see 2,950 birth control patients, compared with 750 per year at a public health center or 330 at a FQHC. Planned Parenthood clinics are 10% of the public funded contraceptive providers in the country by number, but they serve 36% of the patients who use that funding. Given the lack of access to pap smears (along with other basic gynecological care) at FQHCs, it’s a fair bet that many people who get primary care at a FQHC get their reproductive care at a PP clinic.
PP clinics are specifically tailored for this purpose; they have a system, they have staff who specialize in reproductive healthcare. The number of clinics or the number of patients seen per clinic doesn’t tell the full story of what care is given to who, and how, and if that care is timely (rather important where contraceptives, STD care and cancer screenings are concerned) and efficient.
In Texas, when they excluded Planned Parenthood from the Texas Women’s Health Program (TWHP), 9% fewer patients were seen overall under that program in the next year – but in western Texas, where two Planned Parenthood clinics closed and no new clinics funded under the TWHP were opened, 40% fewer patients received care covered by TWHP funding. Part of that was the inability of existing clinics to absorb the patient load, but another part of that was that other clinics didn’t have Planned Parenthood’s sliding fee structure and former PP patients who are uninsured and low income weren’t able to afford care at the other clinics. Two of every 5 PP patients in west Texas no longer have access to contraceptives – or STD testing and care, pap smears, breast exams, or referrals to next level care with connections to grant programs to help pay for it. That is a crisis, (particularly in a time when access to healthcare is being expanded, not contracted, nationally) and that is what happens when people play politics with healthcare.
The Congressional Budget Office estimates that if Planned Parenthood is defunded on the federal level, that up to 25% of its patients would lose all access to care, and increase government costs by up to $130 million because of the increase in unintended pregnancy.
(Cite for all that is Stat check: No, women couldn’t just “go somewhere else” if Planned Parenthood closed | Vox)