Why? Short answer: freedom or leverage, depending on your goals.
While I was in college I wondered this myself: why would anyone buy a home? After college was over I found out more things about it and ran some more numbers, and found it made sense. So I tried it, and it worked out highly in my favor.
But, as mentioned, it’s all about 2 things: tradeoffs and investment risk. I’m not going to discuss apartment vs. house, because that’s not apples and apples. I’m discussing renting vs owning the same property.
- Tradeoffs. These have been discussed. When you own, you have to do (or hire) your own maintenance, but you can do things the way YOU want. Paint the walls green if you want, or drill big holes in the wall to mount something or other. Or add a bathroom. If you like basic white and you don’t want to tinker, renting may be the better choice.
In many ways, owning is the ultimate freedom to do what you want with your house, while when renting you’re simply not free to do what you wish. If freedom is of value, this may be a dream for you.
- When you rent, there IS no investment. Buying a home is (for most people) a matter of putting 1/5 of the price together at once and borrowing 4/5 of the total investment and paying the interest on this amount each month. Total payments tend to be a little less than that of rent, but not a lot, and the renter didn’t have to shell out 1/5 of the total up front.
So let’s assume a simple scenario for a moment: no income tax implications, no change in value of the home, no inflation, and a $100,000 house. A renter pays say $800/mo. An owner had to put down $20,000, but pays (including property taxes and insurance) say $700/mo. In addition, depending on how long he’s had the loan, some portion of that $700 is NOT interest or other payments, and instead pays down the principal of the loan. After 30 years of living like this, our renter, R, has payed $8001230, and has nothing to show for it. The owner, O, has payed $7001230 plus the $20,000 down payment, and has a $100,000 investment in a home which he owns free and clear, and could sell at any time for essentially $100,000. A grand total of a $116,000 difference.
The above scenario isn’t perfect for many reasons. Moving when you’re renting is far easier and cheaper than moving when you own (no huge realtor fees, among others!). Rental prices in some areas can be smaller than mortgages, especially if you forgot to include property taxes and insurance (rare, but it happens). And there ARE tax implications and values DO change and so on.
Income taxes are designed to favor the home owner. Renter R gets no tax breaks for renting any home. Owner O, however, gets to deduct his mortgage payments. Of the $700 above, some $500 or so is actually interest, and that’s the amount he can deduct. If he’s in a 20% tax bracket, that $500 subtracts $100 from the taxes he would owe, so it’s like he’s only paying $600/mo instead of $700, and the rest will catch up after April 15 in the form of a refund check. (NOTE: this benefit only applies if you itemize your deductions! If not, it’s assumed and included in the general deduction)
And now we get to the area where people really make money on Real Estate, and that is the investment. Ignoring flipping, Real Estate investment is a long-term growth investment. Just like with the stock market, there are ups and downs, but just like with the stock market, the trends overall are positive. Real Estate, on average, over the last 100 years or so, has gone up around 6%/yr in the USA. That may not sound like a ton, especially when you consider that inflation is around 3%, but there’s an important factor here: leverage.
See, if you’ve got $20k, and you invest in a really good stock that does 10%/yr without fail, you get $2k the first year, $2.2k the next, and so on. If you invest $20k in a $100k home, however, and it increases just 5%, it gained $5k, and that’s YOURS, not the bank’s. That’s 2 and a half times. Yes, you have to pay interest on the loans, but you were using that as a rent-type “you’ve got to live” expense, anyway. On the $20k you invested, a $5k gain is 25%. That’s huge.
This leverage can go the opposite way, of course, as hordes of people found out recently. If the $100k house loses 30% of its value, not only do you no longer have the $20k you put down, but you also owe an additional $10k you’d have to PAY if you sold the home. The power of leverage is a multiplier of both positive and negative market shifts.
So is owning a home a good financial choice? Well, it could be said to be a gamble, for sure, but since the market >tends< to go up, it >tends< to be a good idea. It’s like owning a casino: sometimes the house loses, but usually it wins. If you can’t handle any kind of risk, probably renting is a better idea. If you can handle risk, though, AND you do some research on trends IN YOUR AREA, it can be a good idea to buy.
I’d personally never buy if I thought I was going to live in a place for less than a couple of years. The fees and so forth from agents and whatnot just end up being too high and even if the value of the property increases, I’ll most likely be in the red overall. But if I was sure I’d be there at least 3, I’d probably buy most of the time.
So in summary, it’s all about freedom and a possible investment gain. Hopefully this answers your question.