I have just come across a blurb wherein someone claimed very loudly that 200,000 children in the world starve to death every week.
That did not seem right, and it reminded me of the claim on the cover of “The Population Bomb” (paperback edition, anyway) that four children would starve while “you are reading this [the blurb itself].” A counter-claim that I read later was that the statistic really was about how many people die in third world nations from all causes!
“All causes” would include deaths directly from starvation and from disease linked to malnutrition. But it would also include any war deaths, riots, murders, other homicides, suicides, and a wide variety of accidents. And any diseases not linked to famine or long-term inadequate nutrition. And people just plain too old to go on!
I’ve since been trying a little research on this topic online, and only been partially successful. My main conclusion so far is that the figure “cited” is definitely an inflated one, perhaps early on by someone with an agenda, rather than someone being simply careless. (The oft-quoted factoid that 2/3 of everyone go to bed hungry every night is allegedly only an arithmetic error by a U.N. figure. Adding the wrong columns, or something like that.)
I do also see some early indications that world hunger is simply much less of a monster decade by decade. War-torn countries of course have a much higher per capita of death rate over food issues.
In passing, I also see a trend for high infant mortality rates to be greatly abated as the decades go by. More good news.
(Don’t get me wrong. I’m certainly not blase about the magnitude that remains.)
But I think the careful use of statistics is important too.
Now, I realize there are some gray areas in definitions, and some difficulties in getting the data right everywhere in the world…
But, can someone provide clear estimates of:
1.) “Children” dying from serious lack of food worldwide…
2.) “Children” dying from serious lack of food in nations included as “Third World”…
per week?
(Raw numbers, then relevant per capita figures, please.)
For the purposes of analyses, I think “children” should mean anyone under 18.
Thank you in advance.