He served both those terms before the 22d amendment went into effect. He’d still be eligible.
Cool thanks for the answers. Was wondering if the president had some special no spitting laws as no matter no good or bad a pres you are you’re gonna have people who wanna spit on you.
Also good to know Zombie Cleveland is eligible for office.
Not based strictly on the text. Are you suggesting that restricting him from running for president would somehow amount to an ex post facto law? Because I don’t think that’s the case. That would only be valid if we were discussing criminal law, not constitutional eligibility to the presidency.
I for one welcome our new Zombie Cleveland overlord.
Incorrect. As was discussed several posts ago, only Zombie Truman is still eligible.
From A22
Well, in the first case, the crime clearly be “Assault on the Dead with Sputum”.
(“Assault on a dead revivant”? “Assault on dead three-termer”? Dang, I can smell a AwaDW pun in there somewhere, but I can’t find it
While Grover Cleveland may not be eligible to be elected as president, I see nothing in the 22nd Amendment that prevents him from being elected Vice President, and entering the office by succession (or even possibly a resignation immediately after the election, but before inauguration – though that situation is unclear, no matter who is VP-elect)
If you are ineligible to be the Prez, you are ineligible to be the VP.
Well, that attempt to avert a hijacking certainly worked well.
Well the convo on the 22nd amendment was interesting too.
Was is Zombie Truman or Zombie Cleveland who promised a brain in every pot?
[inevitable zombie hijacking] Backing up to the “zombie” part, would a zombie Former President Cleveland really be considered a legal “person” or “alive” and thus eligible for office? Legally speaking, he’d have already been certified as dead (death certificate issued) and his legal and financial documents (outstanding licenses – including marriage license, bank accounts, etc.) would have been emptied out, nullified, etc. A modern-day zombie would have to get a Social Security number and a [revalidated?] birth certificate, right? And presumably he’d have to get that pesky death certificate nullified. Another legal complication would concern insurance monies paid out and the disposition of debts outstanding at the zombie’s previous death, not to mention the reclaiming of lost assets. Then there’s the medical definition of being alive; do zombies even have heartbeats and measurable brain activity (measured by brainwaves, and not by, say, incessant murmurings of “brains… braaaiiins…”)? Wouldn’t it be easy to get a zombie declared insane and institutionalized, at least in the short term? And wouldn’t any zombie 19th-C. president, even the fleet-footed ones who don’t chant “brains, brains” still fall critically short in the charisma department and come off as strikingly and persistently inarticulate and unpersuasive? And wouldn’t this prevent him from getting his party’s nod, let alone a popular mandate… oh, never mind.[/izh]
Sheesh, everyone knows that was Zombie Hoover. Right before he started cracking heads as part of the lurching, moaning Zombie Bonus Army. “Give us our bonus in braiinnnss . . .”
Just so you know, assualt of the President would be a federal crime, not a state one. From 18 US Code 1751(e)
BTW, laugh at the OP’s premise if you want, but I’m pretty sure this has been tried before
True according to the 12th amendment. But the key point in contention is “What is the definition of ‘constitutional eligibility’?”
Everyone agrees that base eligibility is determined by section II of COTUS.
The issue is this: the 22nd amendment prohibits someone from being elected to president after serving two terms, but does it make them “ineligible” to be president under the constitution? Does the 22nd amendment increase the eligibility restrictions, or is it just limited to elections only?
It’s a constitutional law question that has never been tested, and I’ve seen arguments for both sides and both are legitimate.
If the letter of the law is to be taken, than, yes, a two-term vice president could be VP and become president again should the current Pres be unable to fulfill his duties. If the spirt of the law is to be taken, probably not.
Sounds like a worthy mad science project.
That should be “two-term president”. :smack:
While you would most certainly be charged with some crime and forced to pay some penalty, be it a fine or a jail term, I think anyone contemplating spitting on a president should consider the more immediate consequence: Getting your ass thoroughly kicked by a platoon of guys with dark suits and sunglasses.
The T-men wouldn’t be concerned about what statute was contravened, they’d just jump up and down on your skull until you stopped moving.
Actually, it’s both. Pretty much every state has laws against assault, and there is this Federal law specifically against assault of the President or V.P.
Presumably, the offender could be charged in state court by the local County Attorney, or in Federal Court by the Federal Attorney. (But not both, I think – double jeopardy would prohibit that.)
I know the penalty for throwing an egg at a Deputy Prime Minister is a solid left hook to the face. http://www.unoriginal.co.uk/footage10_6.html. Prescott is an ex-boxer and still packs a mean punch.
Try it with the President and the Secret Service will probably shoot you.