What's the smallest number with no Google hits?

[jtur88]

“Your search - 58732081455 - did not match any documents.”

That eleven digits. But it appears that all ten digit numbers will return a listing of US phone numbers within an area code range, as well as 11-digit numbers beginning with 1. Maybe I should have put this in the Game Room.

[chiroptera]

akagooglewhack. It was A Thing about ten-15 years ago.

[davidm]

I don’t know, but if you post it here then it will no longer have 0 hits.

[buddha_david]

It’s not 241543903, that’s for certain.

[Left_Hand_of_Dorkness]

-17,001,012,013,014 has no hits, but then -17,001,012,013,015 is even smaller and also has none.

Perhaps that’s not what you mean; the number may need to be positive. I got nothing for
0.00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000004000000000000000000000000000131

[davidm]

@Left_Hand_of_Dorkness

-17,001,012,013,014 has no hits, but then -17,001,012,013,015 is even smaller and also has none.

Perhaps that’s not what you mean; the number may need to be positive. I got nothing for
0.00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000004000000000000000000000000000131

That has one hit.
https://www.google.com/search?q=0.00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000004000000000+000000000000000000131&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a&channel=rcs
It has zero if you take out the space.
https://www.google.com/search?q=0.00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000004000000000+000000000000000000131&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a&channel=rcs#channel=rcs&q=0.00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000004000000000000000000000000000131&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official

[chrisk]

OP, I assume you’re talking about natural numbers?

Google has this thread indexed now, so whatever we post, we ruin, but it looks like yours was a pretty good contender. I tried a random ten-digit number with 2, 3, 4, and 5 prepended to it, and got matches for each version.

[Bootis]

@chrisk

OP, I assume you’re talking about natural numbers?

Google has this thread indexed now, so whatever we post, we ruin, but it looks like yours was a pretty good contender. I tried a random ten-digit number with 2, 3, 4, and 5 prepended to it, and got matches for each version.

1410172100eight

has 0 results. for now.

[MichaelHardner]

That number no longer works.

I will submit this: 29999932999+1

God I love numbers…

http://www.mapleleafweb.com/forums/profile/201-michael-hardner/?do=content&type=core_statuses_status&change_section=1

[John_DiFool]

There’s a games thread where people are counting up from zero-they’re up to 4626…