[QUOTE=Samiorange]
How is understanding your opponent moot?
[/QUOTE]
I didn’t say that understanding your opponent is moot. It certainly isn’t. I said that the observation is moot. What did I mean by that? Whether or not HB ACTUALLY wants the territory (and I think they do), their stated goals are in fact to get them. Speculating on whether or not its all they want (it probably isn’t) is moot…we have to take their demand at face value, since this is one of the core demands they make for something resembling a perminent ceasefire. Again, put this in context to what we are discussing here.
[QUOTE=Samiorange]
What I asked you to think about: If the land dispute is settled, Hezbollah loses its claim as a resistance force. Do you think they want that? I don’t, based on the fact that they already have a foothold as a socio-political force in Lebanon, with room for growth. In other words, they can go completely legit at this point. And yet, they resist integration of the militia end into the Lebanese military. Why?
[/QUOTE]
I don’t think its the ‘last thing’ Hezbollah wants, as you put it…I’d say the LAST thing they would want is to be driven completely out of Southern Lebanon, or disbanded as a paramilitary force.
I also don’t think it would make quite the difference you seem to THINK it will make if they manage to get Israel to cave in and give this back to Lebanon would be a HUGE coup for HB across the board. Think about the levels here. Not only a thumb in the arch-enemy Israel’s eye, in complete view of the Arab World. But also a thumb in the US’s eye (who has supported Israel’s claim to that land) AND even in the UN’s eye who has, if not supported Israel’s claim to the land, sided with them wrt to it being formerly SYRIAN land taken during the '67 war. IOW, HB would have triumphed over…well, everyone on this issue, in full world view and brought home the golden bacon. On a silver plater. Um…maybe not bacon literally, but you get the point. 
Having done this, you think they would be seriously worried about losing support for their paramilitary wing?? Even if by some strange chance Lebanon decides that its time for HB to hang em up on the military side ( :dubious: !!) why do you suppose the gravy train from Syria and Iran would stop just because the farms changed hands? Hell, this would probably cause a FLOOD of support, and not just from those find friends.
And its not an either/or proposition you seem to be making it. They are ALREADY legit…in Lebanon. I would guess that the Lebanese would go wild over this, so their political wing would probably go from being a minority to perhaps a majority. Large percentages of the Arab World™ would ALSO be wild about this victory over the forces of darkness, and I imagine nutballs and hotheads from all corners would be begging to join up. With more funds and even more political power they COULD become a power to be reckoned with in dem dar parts…both politically AND paramilitarily (and lets not forget the whole ‘terrorist’ thing, ehe).
The thing you seem to be leaving out of your calculations is that these groups somehow need legitimacy or something. They don’t. They only need funding and the support of the local populations…local populations that have been trained for literally generations to hate and fear Israel. If Israel gives back that land (to Lebanon…might be different if they hand it back to Syria) it will show weakness on their part…why do you presume that Israel showing weakness would be responded to by peace and the disbanding of the successful paramilitary organization that FORCED them to that weakness?
[QUOTE=Samiorange]
I’m really asking. I’d like to discuss this, rather than put forward pre-chewed talking points (in spite of what your friend keeps implying).
[/QUOTE]
I think he’s made some good points to be honest, both here and especially in other related threads…and I will freely admit that his own knowledge on this subject surpasses my own. That said, above is my thoughts…do with them as you will.
-XT