Prosecutors recommend that former Representative Duke Cunningham ® CA receive 10 years in jail on corruption charges. The AP story notes the existence of a “bribe memo”:
A copy of the relevant page of the sentencing memorandum is here. It shows some scrawlings that I’ve recalculated as follows:
Government Contract Bribe Kickback Percentage
16 million $140,000 0.875%
20 million 340,000 1.7%
25 million 440,000 1.76%
My question is, “Was Cunningham undercharging?” My understanding is that far higher shares are paid in the third world, albeit to a larger number of corrupt officials. But that’s actually a pattern: for some reason bribes are both higher and more common in developing countries.
How do Cunningham’s percentages compare with those on, say, corrupt city contracts in the US or in other examples of malfeasance?