I find his decisions and actions troubling. Such as:
Rust v. Sullivan, 500 U.S. 173 (1991) Roberts argued that they "continue to believe that Roe was wrongly decided and should be overruled . " Putting him on the SC is a threat to reproductive freedom.
Bray v. Alexandria Women’s Health Clinic, 506 U.S. 263 (1993) Roberts filed an amicus curiae brief in support of the radical anti-abortion group Operation Rescue.
United States v. Eichman, 496 U.S. 310 (1990) Roberts co-authored the government brief in this this case arguing that the Flag Protection Act of 1989 was constitutional. In this case, Roberts reveals himself as an enemy of free speech.
Hedgepeth v. Wash. Metro. Area Transit Auth., 386 F.3d 1148 (D.C. Cir. 2004):
Roberts joined the majority in a ruling against the mother of a 12 year old who was searched, handcuffed, had her shoelaces removed, fingerprinted, and held for three hours until released to her mother. Her crime: eating a single French fry on the DC Metro. The mother’s claims that the excessive actions of the police violated her daughter’s equal protection (adults who were guilty of the same violation received a citation while juveniles got arrested) Roberts is an enemy of individual freedom and a friend of the police state.
I think Roberts is too far to the right and outside of any reasonable mainstream.