That and lets be honest:
[spoiler]…you’d be slappin’ on Amendments like a Muther-F-ck!!!
…whose your signer?
…whose your signer?
Yeah, Baby…!
[/spoiler]
She’s got back dimples. I fucking love back dimples!
Next up: What’s wrong with this thread title?
Yeah, I know. I DID try to correct it.
So what you’re saying is that it’s real and it’s spectacular?
Yeah, but she’s got a nice aff.
Isn’t she Canadian?
It’s styling. It’s in. It’s very in.
“Fake! Fake! Fake! Fake!”
What’s Wrong With This Picture (of Julia Louis Dreyfuss’ Bare Butt)?
Not a damn thing.
She may have a fine aſs, but it isn’t in the picture.
Any chance they did it on purpose?
The wrong signature thing, I mean. Those rolling stoners seem like the kind of cats that might just think it was a hilarious thing to do. I may agree!
Guys, you don’t realize that the signature is her real tattoo.
The main problem with that picture is that it is too small.
Nevermind.
Count Blucher: Let me fix that spoiler for you.
[spoiler]…you’d be slappin’ on Amendments like a Muther-F-ck!!!
…who’s your signer?
…who’s your signer?
Yeah, Baby…!
[/spoiler]
I call dibs on adding the amendments.
Nah. Birthmark.
Never mind. Should have refreshed.
I would have never recognized her on that cover. She looked so different on Seinfeld. Perfect makeup, hair and nice clothes. Naked and her hair a mess is quite a change.
Other than the inaccurate Hancock signature, I would have to say that she has the best looking ass on a 51 year-old billionaire that I have ever seen.