I see a lot of people give flak to others, on both sides, (usually groups rather than individuals) about “voting against their own self interest” as if this is some moronic thing.
One example is a few panels in this comic* from The Oatmeal, which portrays a less religious liberal and religious conservative, and makes the point that the liberal is a small business owner who the conservative candidate’s economic policies will hurt, and the conservative voter’s income bracket will be hurt by the conservative candidate’s plan. The way this is presented is clearly supposed to be ridiculous, and they both immediately start shouting about social issues (which, again, is supposed to look ridiculous). The general tenor of the section is that caring about religion (and social issues) is dumb and people “should” be voting purely in their own, personal economic self interest.
That’s just one example, though, and I’ve seen the implication that someone is dumb for “voting against their own self interest” many times, whether it be liberal self business owners or conservative minorities. It seems to be a common accusation.
But my perspective is… so what? Yes, sometimes ill informed people can be lied to, tricked, or simply via simple misinterpretation vote against their self interest. That’s a bit of ignorance and I can see it being a bit vexing. However, it seems like there are many reasons somebody could, completely lucidly and knowingly, vote against their own self interest, and I’d call the scenarios pretty common.
Pretty much any wealthy liberal calling for more capital gains or high income bracket taxes is voting against their self interest, but they may earnestly believe it can help the poor or improve infrastructure. But even a conservative could honestly believe “yes, a tax break for the rich may be harder on me, but hell, I made a lot of mistakes. People who make that kind of money shouldn’t have to prop me up.” It’s a viewpoint that, while I may not 100% agree with myself, is an ethical belief I’m not sure is worthy of ridicule just because it’s against the voter’s personal self interest.
In fact, in a limited-party system, it’s almost impossible to vote entirely in one’s own self interest. At some point, a candidate is likely to have views that both help you and hurt you. Maybe one party proposes tax breaks for your bracket, but also wants to impose trade sanctions on a country that your company does a lot of business with, or any other number of small things. A conservative economist at a university, as another example, may face dilemmas when presented with candidates like Walker who may have the economic policies they endorse, but also have historically endorsed policies that threaten a lot of the more professor-friendly status quo of universities.
So why do we chastise groups for voting “against their self interest”? It seems like an untenable criticism to me. Yes, there are people who “vote against their self interest” out of ignorance when there’s overwhelming evidence the policies are wrong, all the while believing it is helping them. However, I don’t feel like that’s worth a blanket joke at the whole concept of voting for people who may not make your personal life the best.
[size=1]* Which honestly is a bit annoying