Yeah they were pretty awful. The one to the right looked pretty damn close with the TC hanging out of the hatch with all that ammo cooking off.
The rebels failed to follow one of the first things I learned as a young soldier. Always go after the vehicle with the biggest antenna.
Unfortunately I can’t locate my copy of John Ellis’ excellent book On the Front Lines: The Experience of War through the Eyes of the Allied Soldiers in World War II and some of the relevant pages aren’t available on-line, but among the descriptions he gives:
I don’t understand how the guy escaped from the tank, when it got hit and the ammunition exploded shouldn’t he have been killed instantly? But yet he was able to run out of the tank.
I counted 7-8 seconds in-between the moment the rocket hits and the moment the large flames come out. During that delay, there is a lot of smoke which hides what’s going on on top of the tank. I guess he climbed out/got ejected during that delay.
What likely happened in that video is that the main gun rounds (propellant and maybe explosives) caught fire, since there wasn’t an large explosion (they tend to fling the turrets off).
Plus, it looks a lot like this M1 Abrams test of the separate ammo stowage.
What happens when the ammo actually explodes.Wouldn’t the concussion of the exploding shell kill everybody instantly? That is far better than being grilled alive!
IIRC, the Sovs used a hi-lo combination,with the T72 being the lo and the T64 the high end.
The guy who got out probably wasn’t in the compartment with the ammo.
Quite right, although the mix depended on exactly when you’re looking at it, since the T-80 was the follow-on to the T-64, and the T-90 would have been the follow-on to the T-72.
Even with the hi-lo combination, the Russian T-72s were better equipped than the export versions- they had better rangefinders, etc…
Although I’m sure it’s not the norm, people did and do escape from tanks often enough that one hears about it. In a Military Channel show, they interviewed a former German tanker who asserted that it was considered bad in the German Army to leave a tank that was not actively on fire, and he described sitting in his disabled Panther as it took several hits. When it finally began to burn, the crew escaped, possibly because they were VERY ready to leave at that point.
The Israeli Merkava tanks are designed to protect the crew (the engine is even in front of the crewmen so it will be destroyed first but save lives), and they have a special rear escape hatch intended to facilitate quick exit.
As mentioned above, the American M-1 has both a special compartment designed to direct the force of exploding ammo away from the crew, and a fire suppression system. I read of one M-1 being hit and the crew bailed out, except for the driver, who could not be reached. He remained in the burning tank, assumed to be dead, until tank recovery forces arrived and finally reached his compartment – to discover that the fire suppression had kept him cool and the onboard oxygen had kept him alive (for some prolonged period of time that I forget.)
I’m not saying I’d want to be in a tank that was hit, of course.
I have read that the engine in front idea was based upon the threat from the 1967 and 1973 wars, whereby the engine could reduce impact from HEAT and Sagger/RPG-7 shots. Apparently, the engine in front is a bad idea if you are facing KE penetrators, especially DU ones, since they have been known to knock the engine block right out, and this is for rear engined tanks, in front engined tanks,the engine will be travelling, through the crew compartment.
Waiting for someone with more knowledge to come and tell me that I completely misunderstood what the guy was saying,or its not as much of a risk ete etc,
With how heavily armored the Panther was (frontally it was better armored than the Tiger I) it made much more sense to not immediately bail out after the first hit; the Sherman not only had much thinner armor and a reputation for easily catching fire, German anti-tank guns were on average more powerful than Allied ones so bailing out of a Sherman before waiting for the second hit was a much wiser thing to do. On the other hand, the crew of a Panther didn’t have to wait to be hit for their tank to catch on fire; one of the teething problems with early models was that the engine could spontaneously catch fire.
The T64’s autoloader would try to load the gunner’s leg into the breech. Tanks are complicated bitches,
That doesn’t sound right. A KE penetrator that went through the main armor would still have to try and go through the engine itself, which would be much harder, because the main armor would tend to break up and reduce the KE of the penetrator significantly.
However, the idea may have been that a shaped-charge that penetrated the main armor would almost certainly not have the penetration distance to get to the crew compartment via the engine compartment, while a KE penetrator might, due to the differing mechanisms of penetration. One of the most effective defenses against HEAT rounds is to prematurely detonate them so that the liner jet would spend it’s energy against air, which is what the main armor would basically do in this case. KE penetrators OTOH, basically concentrate enough kinetic energy on a small point to just put a hole in the armor- if the penetrator was still going fast enough after penetrating the main armor, it might miss the engine entirely and go into the crew compartment.
Quite impressive is this video (the jack-in-the-box effect is really brought home starting at the 50 second mark although it’s also very clearly seen earlier in the film, too).
What strange new doctrine be this?:dubious:
A thread on a more military oriented forum about the same video (starts about mid-way on pg 102)
Couldn’t read the other forum at work but background on the video:
Shot at Redstone Arsenal test range post Desert Storm I. That’s Dodd road along side the tank - I used to bicycle commute along there until the closed off the road entirely. It’s a TOW 2B top attack missile. The missile flies over the tank (this test had the tank fully operational with ammo, batteries, fuel, etc…), sensors on the missle detect the tank - large metal mass/other. Two shaped plate charges fire downwards. The plates penetrate the tank and set off the munitions inside along with all the rest of the flammable stuff. There should also be a video out there of an uploaded T-72 being destroyed by a Javelin missile which has a “standard” HEAT warhead (precursor and main charges). We had lots tanks and ammo from the war to use for warhead evaluation against real targets.