When did you lose the misconception that stupid little kids were the ones that existed?

Sorry, I don’t understand what you are saying “no” to.

I myself had no such misconception. Are you saying I’m wrong and that yes I did?

Are you saying “no” because you thought I misunderstood what you were saying? Are you not able to see that my reply is saying “no” to YOUR assertion that the phrase “A five year old knows better” somehow means only morons have been born within the last 5 years? I am saying it sure as hell doesn’t mean that to ME.

Like many other people on this thread, I’m amazed that you would think in those terms since you have been a five year old and presumably know fully well that you were not a moron.

That’s not what that means. It means that by age 5 (or whatever) you have learned whatever a 5 year old is supposed to know, so act like it.

Since I was once a child, and I was not a moron, I’ve never had the idea that children are morons.

I’ve been a caretaker since I was old enough to follow instructions more complicated than “no!” Experience tells me that the people who are more likely to have no idea what children are like are those who were on the younger side of their peer cohort (family, neighbors); that is, those who didn’t grow up playing shepherd to a bunch of younger kids. I remember a few of my sheep being pretty goaty, but not a single stupid one.

And I agree that “a 5yo knows better” means that the person being addressed is acting less maturely than the average 5yo, not that 5yos are morons.

Which age? You don’t mention it, and “very young children” means different things to different people. 2mo, 2yo, 5yo? Different ages need different types of discipline, but “don’t give speeches to a toddler” doesn’t equal “a sharp ‘no!’ and taking away the thing they should not touch will not work with toddlers”. For a 2mo yeah, there is no point even on the “no”, all it will do is scare them.

Another nope. That phrase means that the person being addressed (who is significantly older than 5) is not meeting the standards of typical 5 year old behavior. This implies that there is a standard for 5 year old behavior, also that there are standards for 1 year, 2 years, and so on. Only the person being addressed is being marked as deficient. Usually the phrase also implies that the person being addressed is behaving badly temporarily, and that they are capable of better behavior.

It’s similar to the phrase “act your age”, which, sadly, is often used when children are acting their age. Both phrases are an attempt to shame. Both phrases imply that other children are normal, but the child being spoken to is deficient.

I never thought most kids were stupid or annoying.

And luckily, none of my adult relatives thought so when I was a kid myself.

Ah ---- OK; that makes sense. I have seen such displays although I will say that in my experience I find them quite rare and easy to ignore. But that could just be me.

Now that my kids are reaching middle age, what I feel when I hear a baby or small child crying is a little flood of relief. Aaaah, it’s not my problem.

This is typically my first thought also. If the parent is nearby and then apologizes, my answer is usually along the lines of “been there myself.”

And as to an above post, some of my relatives were annoyed by misbehaving toddlers. My grandparents generations remembered seen but not heard but I’m sure didn’t actually live it themselves at the time.

It’s true! You ever asked a baby that’s just born ANYTHING? They’re dumb as hell, they don’t know shit.

"Hey, newborn. What’s the square root of 100?
"Nope? Okay, let’s go easier. 3x3?
"Okay, 1+1?
"Who’s the president?
"What day is today?
“Christ, kid. How many fingers am I holding up?”

THEY CAN’T ANSWER ANY OF THEM RIGHT! It’s pathetic. Morons, every one a them!