Strawman argument.
You manufacture “what Liberals say” out of certain addled ramblings you have heard from non-Liberals, refute it without proof, and then grin like you won the Nobel prize, & declare victory.
Sorry, no.
This point highlights an important distinction: colonization is a nascent form of war. Colonial territory is a kind of conquest. The colonized may organize to say, “We aren’t your subjects, we are our own sovereigns.” At this point they are on their way to their own law and are a separate entity. They aren’t criminals, they’re rebels- at least until they’re caught.
Actually, the early Earl Warren was far more of both than the later one. 
The Rodney King riots were much more about the second reason for rioting, although looting happened and of course the inciting point was the perceived injustice. The London ones went very rapidly from the first reason to the second to the third; certainly the Croydon rioting had very little to do with the first two reasons and much more to do with people being poor, bored, frustrated and perceiving a chance to steal and burn stuff for fun (note that the “burning” was actually fairly minimal in terms of fires set - I think there were two, although the Reeves building did burn spectacularly once alight).
In all the footage I saw, these suburbs appeared more like dense multi-level housing complexes on the outskirts of the city.
Typical leftist rubbish.
John Mace and I have long been known on this board for our far left leanings.
And the founding fathers too.
Are you whooshing my whoosh?
Yep.
Rows of houses that are all the same.
And no one seems to care!