Soccer isn’t considered an endurance sport and that’s a 90 minute exercise, albeit with a 15 minute break and plenty of small breaks.
I don’t think Sprint Triathlon is quite there either (about 90 mins depending on who you are, with opportunities for occasional breaks on the bike leg)
I do think a half marathon is pretty much an endurance activity but I’m kind of wondering if how you perform matters; you need to be in pretty good shape to get under 2 hours - that would be working continuously at a decent bpm yet, conversely if you jog-walk-job and get round in 2:30 then, well … probably not.
In professional soccer there are only 3 substitutions per game per team. So if you exclude the goalie then 7 of the 10 players have to play all 90 minutes.
Depends on the league. FIFA rules (which most leagues play under) do not allow the return of a substituted player. There is also a maximum of 3 substitutes per game, but again the depends on the local rules.
Yes, a half marathon counts as an endurance event, no matter how fast you run it. I would think that any event that lasts an hour of constant cardio activity would qualify.
The 400/800 double is vanishingly rare at the world class level. Somewhere between :45 and 1:41, aerobic energy pathways make up the main energy source. Up to an hour, running speeds in an all out performance result in a build up of lactic acid. After that, it’s not oxygen debt but muscular fatigue that limits performance( at an even pace).
Even world class marathoners, running at below 4:45/mile, show no build up of lactic acid in their systems.
Running isn’t an endurance sport by that fact alone. A marathon is because everyone is jazzed when you finish regardless of your time because finishing is the purpose. A 100m sprint isn’t an endurance sport because everyone can finish that and all that matters is your time.
The same is true for cycling or swimming events… or any other type of activity. It’s a good definition.