All information is biased to some degree. The OP question is interesting because it harks to another question, but adds “I want it but I don’t want to actually have to DO anything to get it.”
If you want to be informed, first of all realize you have to get the info.
Second have an open mind.
Third ask yourself does the author present the other side.
A good site should present a side, present the possible objections to that point of view and then refute those objections
Most things today are a result of pleasent or interesting personalities.
Let me give you an example, have you ever seen the View? Now one thing that strikes me odd about that show is how often Elisabeth Hasselbeck is right. Or at least she has a valid point. The problem with the show is Hasselbeck does not have the mental capacity to back any of her points up. So she comes off just looking stupid.
For instance, if I said “The speed of light is a constant.” Now that’s correct and I’m right. But if someone said “Why is that?” And I replied “I dunno,” even though I was right I’d come off as looking stupid and people would ignore me.
Also beware of what I call “not to fussy with the truth.” For instance, if someone uses the term “rip off” it’s so open ended it’s a worthless thing to say, because it means different things to different people.
For example, if I said “Extended warranties are a rip off” Some would agree but others would say “Since no one is forcing you to buy there is no rip off.”
You see how it works.
Finally avoid sentiment. Too many news sites sell you on heart felt things that are meaningless in terms of news. For example, when an 18 year old kid is shot down in cold blood that is a horrible crime. I don’t need the news people to say “He was working for money to go to college.” That is pure drivel. It makes no difference if he was going to college or saving money to buy a new tattoo, the point is he’s the victim of a cold blooded crime.