As I meant to suggest in my post, my experience with Toyotas and Hondas (re: comparing impressions) is dated. Late-1970s.
I’ve had two German cars; a Porsche 924 and a Porsche 911SC. The 924 (which was really an Audi, and was a very underrated car because it happened to be sold with a Porsche badge – it was really a good car, but suffered by comparison to “real Porsches”) had an annoying electrical glitch that caused the windscreen wiper to activate for no apparent reason. This happened especially often on hot days. I can’t recall any electrical problems with the 911.
A former neighbour has a 1970 VW Beetle. Her brother bought it new, and she got it (I think) when it was a month or six months old. Basically, after all this time and considering that it’s still “in her family”, I’d consider it a “one-owner car”. After 33 years it’s still going strong. It’s a simple, solid car. I can’t imagine a Jetta or New Beetla lasting as long.
I remember reading a MPSIMS thread about changing a headlamp in a New Beetle. IIRC it requires a special tool, and the removal of… something. Bumper? I don’t remember. Basically, changing a headlamp would be a $50 shop job. I’ve driven a New Beetle, and I liked it. But such stupid engineering is unacceptable.
The Griffin: (Take your name from Munsters Go Home, by any chance? ) As has been mentioned, American cars are becoming more like Japanese cars. They mostly can’t compete with Japanese cars on fuel economy (my Chevy Sprint did; but then, it was built by Suzuki), but they’re getting better. What I don’t like about them is their quality of construction. That too, seems to be getting better; but still not as good as Japanese cars.
The biggest problem I have with American cars is that they tend to be too big. My first car was a 1966 MGB roadster. My second and third cars were 1977 MGB roadsters. Next came a Porsche 924, followed by a couple of Chevy Sprints. Then the 911. And, of course, I’ve been riding motorcycles since I was a wee’un. Japanese makers have produced “sport-cutes” that are very small; but if you’re looking at a serious SUV, my XJ Cherokee is one of the smallest next to the CJ/YJ/TJ series. (The Toyota Four-Runner is about the same size, I think.) It’s as short in length as a Honda sedan, and shorter in length than many cars. But I still consider it to be huge.
Compared to my earlier cars, American cars don’t handle worth crap. I remember reading an article in the 1980s about the (then-)new Corvette. It was considered to be great for wide, straight American highways, but not good for narrow, twisty European roads.
In my experience – and I point out that much of my experience is with sportscars – American cars don’t handle well at all. To me, they seem to “soft”. Their larger engines seem to take more time to come up to speed than the 4-cylinder (or in the case of the 911, 6-cylinder) powerplants I’ve used. My dad had a 1970 Ford Thunderbird with a 429 cu. in. engine. It accellerated well, but my impression was that it didn’t accellerate as well as one of my sportscars. (It probably did – or did better – but it was just an impression that I had at the time. Probably a result of turning an engine at 2,500 RPM when I’m used to turning it at 3,500-4,500 RPM.)