I don’t even know which one to pit. On one hand, it could be mom thinking this story will fly. On the other, it’s a dealer too stupid to know he just gave away $1000 in free crack . To a 6 year old! :eek:
So… what happened to the crack?
It was taken to the school’s front office for “testing.”
Ah, Tom Lehrer 
“The sheriff’s office says they may never be able to prove from where the crack came.”
Is it me, or does the article sound like it was written by a six year old?
Oh, now I get it!
This guys was just trying to spread the wealth of the season like some cracked up easter bunny bouncing through the yard tossing out handfulls of yummy cracky goodness in hopes that children would share the wealth and happiness that he bestowed upon them.
WTF is wrong with people?Just another idiot
Sorry for double post, but I wasn’t done yet.
They removed her from the classroom? WTF?
When I was a child they had a big deal trying to get the students to turn our parents in if we saw Funny cigaretts or smells funny smells when they smoked.
Now this child brings this to school, and they don’t say if she was showing it off or trying to tell an adult about it and they yank her?
Now they aren’t going to let her come back because her mother used a false address to get her into that school? Maybe they had just moved and didn’t want to pull her child in the middle of the year, maybe she did it because she was trying to get her child a better education. Heck, it could be as simple as she is one house down from the district dividing line. Why was this even brought up in the first place.
Bad first grader! Naughty! You should have told your mother you weren’t supposed to be going to that school.
First she is probably confused on why she got sent home the day and now she had to deal with the possibility of not seeing the friends she has come to know?
Sure, first grade will be easier to adjust to moving than if she had gone to that school for years, but come on, let’s add more confusion.
I’m confused as to the reason why the mother used a false address to get the kid enrolled is relevant. The child was not in the right school based on where she lives and the mother knowingly gave false information to get her in, so the girl can’t come back. What’s the problem?
It’s not relevent to what was at hand.
Sounds like maybe they put it in there as to say “see, if she would have been in the school she belonged in this would have never happened, this disruption of our school”.
I guess it wouldn’t be much of a story if they didn’t throw in other things.
Being yanked out of her class will irritate bleeding hearts (like me I guess), not going to the right school will irritate local tax payers.
Why can’t anything be simple?
They got the crack from a child, the most important thing is finding where it came from, not yanking a child from school so she misses out on some education, or that she wasn’t at the right school all along.
Children have crack! That is an issue!
So, did she bring enough for the whole class?